BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Double heading

To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Double heading
From: "Russ Strodtz" <normansen@groundcontrol.us>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:15:12 -0500
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1245428330; bh=Zq77e9NMwmLTY8PP3N5sVn2qRdKESaYLfK/YULKWe70=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-ID:To:References:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-DWNI-Authenticated-User:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=C/rBpndGwlpMxJ60Io90wvvj/Q2nS3XRQTtx7Lr4eflVTc/i17Hwd0ePpeqcwEM47WUSl6mrEbxjbMJ7XXmQAwigwwthvocK6a8O/k3KpU7G3q+p4tPX5oRV63dkJTcl
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=K36P2rs3FD37tG3Gf0kkrVuaW23huwlfLp1HCMLgL0Noak5b15+3RP1c8uDS+NQ9L6Fugp3Y+AYVT2BId3cS7buDChM6caBKd/jAx8TkPtjxMVOT437giHp7QqFgeRby;
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <CEE9DC0AFE29470F9E95DBEA7F68A117@STUDY> <BAY113-W218BAF31D62A44A397BF50B83A0@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
MILW SW-1's running south/east from Austin MN had MU.
Saw many times being used. Have photos somewhere.

In 1966-1967 Aurora to West Chicago was almost always used
by GP7's.

Chicago to Aurora was against rules to use whistles other than
emergency. That was at least back to the 40's, may have been
earlier.

Russ
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gerald & Virginia Edgar" <vje68@hotmail.com>
To: <cbq@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, 19 June, 2009 07:34
Subject: RE: [CBQ] Double heading




These very interesting posts began with the premise that doubleheading was only 
a steam loco phenomena but we need to remember many early diesels did NOT M.U.  
I personally do not know of CB&Q diesels being doubleheaded that were not MU'ed 
but there is a lot of literature about the Milw using 3 & 4 non-MU'ed SW-1's, 
each with it's own crew, to operate across southern Minnesota (a line with 
light bridges that would not handle road units).  They followed the same 
procedures that have been cited in the posts here.  

 

As for communications with even a singe engine, well into the 70's, BN on ex-Q 
trackage had crews that relied heavily on lantern & whistle signals to 
communicate because they did not have radios (the Aurora-West Chicago line 
being an example)   Check any CB&Q Rule Book (or other RR's for that matter as 
the signals were uniform) for all the actions that could be initated by certain 
lantern motions or series of whistle blasts.  It's a lost art but I am sure 
there are times today when a crew with b/o radios wish the newbies could truly 
"communicate".   Gerald 


  









[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    mailto:CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>