BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BRHSlist] Lines west (and south)

To: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] Lines west (and south)
From: Wes Leatherock <wleath@s...>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:35:57 -0600 (CST)
In-reply-to: <3ABC4EDE.A31A5B1@p...>
I have never heard of this except in Texas. What information
do you have that "most southern states" had such a requirement?


Wes Leatherock
wleath@s...


On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 hold-on@s... wrote:
> Eric
> Most southern states kept states rights and therefore all companines had to be
> chartered in the state even though it was a part of a larger corp.
> SJH
> 
> Eric Jacobsen wrote:
> 
> > I've always wondered...what were some of these legal reasons? Taxes?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Eric
> >
> > > The C&S and FW&D were interlocked to the Q by boards of directors, and 
> > > were
> > > regarded as part of the "Burlington Route" (and thus of the Hill Lines), 
> > > but
> > > for legal reasons, they were separate corporate entities.
> > >
> > > Marshall


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>