| To: | BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [BRHSlist] Lines west (and south) |
| From: | "Eric Jacobsen" <jacobsen@m...> |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:31:05 -0600 |
| In-reply-to: | <004b01c0b35b$62be2c00$804e1c41@k...> |
| Priority: | normal |
| Reply-to: | jacobsen@w... |
I've always wondered...what were some of these legal reasons? Taxes? Thanks! Eric > The C&S and FW&D were interlocked to the Q by boards of directors, and were > regarded as part of the "Burlington Route" (and thus of the Hill Lines), but > for legal reasons, they were separate corporate entities. > > Marshall ------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Jacobsen - jacobsen@w... - http://www.mc.edu/~jacobsen/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [BRHSlist] Lines west (and south), william jensen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [BRHSlist] West Lines, Wes Leatherock |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [BRHSlist] Lines west (and south), M. Thayer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [BRHSlist] Lines west (and south), Wes Leatherock |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |