Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+RPO\s+storage\s+mail\s+for\s+Chicago\s+leg\s+of\s+Builder\?\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder? (score: 1)
Author: "little-q@att.net" <trains@davidstreeter.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 16:12:19 -0500
Is there a readily available, reasonably accurate HO scale Q RPO that would be appropriate for the Chicago - St. Paul leg of the Empire Builder in the 1955-60 era? I just learned that the GN's RPO di
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-09/msg00108.html (11,438 bytes)

2. Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder? (score: 1)
Author: "Hudson Leighton" <hudsonl@skypoint.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 14:26:43 -0700
The MILW, I believe had the Chicago to St. Paul mail contract, so the CBQ only handled local mail. -Hudson _._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-09/msg00109.html (12,133 bytes)

3. Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder? (score: 1)
Author: "Bryan Howell via groups.io" <tubaman21=yahoo.com@groups.io>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 21:39:23 +0000 (UTC)
_._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#62557) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group O
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-09/msg00110.html (15,468 bytes)

4. Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder? (score: 1)
Author: "james miller" <jimbro67@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 16:43:21 -0500
Q only handled local mail on the Blackhawk. Nothing on the Builder. On Thu, Sep 16, 2021, 4:12 PM little-q@att.net <trains@davidstreeter.net> wrote: Is there a readily available, reasonably accurate
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-09/msg00111.html (13,328 bytes)

5. Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder? (score: 1)
Author: "Bryan Howell via groups.io" <tubaman21=yahoo.com@groups.io>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 06:24:16 -0700
In the Strauss Passenger books, he says the RPOs were in service between St. Paul and Chicago on Trains 25 and 32 in addition to 47/48. BB #8 shows this route (Chicago, Savanna & Minneapolis) in serv
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-09/msg00113.html (12,744 bytes)

6. Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder? (score: 1)
Author: "little-q@att.net" <trains@davidstreeter.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 20:31:38 -0500
Let me give more details from GNRHS Reference Sheet No. 227: The consist list has Baggage car: storage mail, St. Paul to Spokane (westbound) RPO-storage mail car, St. Paul to Seattle Baggage car: sto
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-09/msg00120.html (14,378 bytes)

7. Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder? (score: 1)
Author: "William Barber" <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 10:57:57 -0500
Attached are several photos of the Empire Builder from the BRHS Flickr gallery that show the train with a GN RPO mail car in consist while on the Q. The first was taken on 10-9-1950, the second on 6-
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-09/msg00121.html (13,382 bytes)

8. Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder? (score: 1)
Author: "Bryan Howell via groups.io" <tubaman21=yahoo.com@groups.io>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 16:33:12 +0000 (UTC)
_._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#62569) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-09/msg00122.html (15,572 bytes)

9. Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder? (score: 1)
Author: "Bryan Howell via groups.io" <tubaman21=yahoo.com@groups.io>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 16:50:33 +0000 (UTC)
_._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#62570) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-09/msg00123.html (16,648 bytes)

10. Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Gortowski via groups.io" <rgortowski=aol.com@groups.io>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 18:30:27 +0000 (UTC)
If this is the first run of the mid-century Builder, the date is wrong. The first run was June 3rd, 1951. The Builder between St Paul and Chicago on Q tracks did have the RPO car. Definitely a stunni
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-09/msg00124.html (16,964 bytes)

11. Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder? (score: 1)
Author: "Bryan Howell via groups.io" <tubaman21=yahoo.com@groups.io>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 20:24:04 +0000 (UTC)
Rich, You are absolutely correct. The caption in the CB&Q Flickr account matches that of the Center for Rail Photography and Art caption. This is a Wallace W. Abbey photo in their collection. I can't
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-09/msg00125.html (20,284 bytes)

12. Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder? (score: 1)
Author: "little-q@att.net" <trains@davidstreeter.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 20:54:54 -0500
In the second and third photos, I think that's the baggage-dorm, not the RPO, based on the window pattern. The leading full baggage would be storage mail. Still, the photos are useful; thanks. Are th
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-09/msg00126.html (13,952 bytes)

13. Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder? (score: 1)
Author: "cprengineer via groups.io" <cprengineer=yahoo.com@groups.io>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 12:33:57 -0700
I'd like to run a combined EB/NCL in HO Scale. I have the Walthers Empire Builder cars, a number of their NP-painted cars, and several Proto Q E's. The info above on the Q RPO is helpful. What years
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-09/msg00150.html (13,202 bytes)

14. Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 15:11:28 -0500
_._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#62597) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group O
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-09/msg00151.html (14,731 bytes)

15. Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Schultz via groups.io" <jwschultz9=aol.com@groups.io>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 04:04:26 +0000 (UTC)
Marty -- Beginning September 30, 1960, the eastbound Builder and North Coast were consolidated east of St. Paul in the "off season" (mid-September to mid-December; January 3 to May 31). Westbound, th
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-09/msg00158.html (19,245 bytes)

16. Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder? (score: 1)
Author: "cprengineer via groups.io" <cprengineer=yahoo.com@groups.io>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:20:26 -0700
Hi Bill, Thanks a ton! That helps a lot. I've got the NP books, and they talk about what cars ran through, but it's a bit confusing; maybe if I wasn't reading as I'm falling asleep! It would certainl
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-09/msg00161.html (12,789 bytes)

17. Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder? (score: 1)
Author: "cprengineer via groups.io" <cprengineer=yahoo.com@groups.io>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 07:30:37 -0700
Charlie, It might be that the mail contracts were set up before Hill gained control of the Q. At one time, Hill was looking at buying the Milwaukee for his Chicago connection, but personality conflic
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-09/msg00163.html (12,730 bytes)

18. Re: [CBQ] RPO storage mail for Chicago leg of Builder? (score: 1)
Author: "cprengineer via groups.io" <cprengineer=yahoo.com@groups.io>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:49:07 -0700
Here's a Shoreham Shops version of 1602/1603: https://www.ebay.com/itm/143570105020?hash=item216d71f2bc:g:wG4AAOSwNlld6qu3 I have no connection to this whatsoever, but I have purchased from this hobb
/archives/BRHSLIST/2021-09/msg00185.html (12,702 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu