- 1. Step Off (score: 1)
- Author: qutlx1@a...
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:28:56 EST
- Recently I discussed the "Aurora step off" that existed off the Northerns and Zephyrs. There was also another version of the step off but it was not so widely sanctioned by management. It also took p
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-11/msg00231.html (7,908 bytes)
- 2. Re: Step Off (score: 1)
- Author: "ed_de_rouin" <PIXELS@A...>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 12:41:57 -0600
- dave_lotz@m...
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-05/msg00111.html (6,907 bytes)
- 3. Step Off (score: 1)
- Author: qutlx1@a...
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 00:16:51 EDT
- Ok Pete here goes. I dont claim to be an expert and I refer all to the excellent explanation provided about a year ago here on the list by someone other than me. But here's my shortened explanation.
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00202.html (7,905 bytes)
- 4. Step Off (score: 1)
- Author: qutlx1@a...
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 00:18:10 EDT
- Ok Pete here goes. I dont claim to be an expert and I refer all to the excellent explanation provided about a year ago here on the list by someone other than me. But here's my shortened explanation.
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00203.html (7,904 bytes)
- 5. Re: Step Off (score: 1)
- Author: "liljop" <wulrich@a...>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:56:15 -0600
- don't again. know for final 22-23, Crews would rather than and apparently happened". yesteryear be the pete, leo could this of fallen under a 'vest pocket agreement'? warren
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00212.html (7,842 bytes)
- 6. Step Off (score: 1)
- Author: qutlx1@a...
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 21:54:08 EDT
- Ok,before those who know interject I'LL admit there was another step off.It was not sanctioned,winked at or tolerated in any way but it did exist right up until the carrier decided that it was good b
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00221.html (7,619 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu