Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Wonder\s+what\s+these\s+trains\s+were\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Wonder\s+what\s+these\s+trains\s+were\s+\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Wonder what these trains were ? (score: 1): Author: Leo <qutlx1@aol.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:57:17 -0600; Copied verbatim is an order that no 48,no 44 ,first and second 50 received at Savanna,IL on 12/17/42. These are all passenger trains and only 48 stops at only Polo and Oregon. The others make no stop; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00180.html (11,303 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Wonder what these trains were ? (score: 1): Author: Noel Crawford <georgecrawfordsr@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:32:37 -0500; 5620 and 5617 were 4-8-4 steam engines. Such an order would or might have said Extra 5620 and 5617 coupled west would mean a double header. Noel 1/16/2014 5:57 PM, Leo wrote: Copied verbatim is an or; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00181.html (13,593 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Wonder what these trains were ? (score: 1): Author: Leo <qutlx1@aol.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:52:36 -0600; 5620 and 5617 were 4-8-4 steam engines. Such an order would or might have said Extra 5620 and 5617 coupled west would mean a double header. Noel 1/16/2014 5:57 PM, Leo wrote: Copied verbatim is an o; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00182.html (14,346 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Wonder what these trains were ? (score: 1): Author: Noel Crawford <georgecrawfordsr@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 20:43:03 -0500; Leo, You are right. If it were a double head move, the the word "Coupled" would appear. I have a LP with a tract of 5632 and 63 (?) going past Mendota Tower in the early 60's on a railfan special.; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00184.html (16,242 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Wonder what these trains were ? (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 23:35:23 -0500 (EST); My guess is that these were MAIN trains...MAIN trains were certainly not low priority trains which I would assume that you implied by your "got stuck in the hole" comment....BTW...I wonder how many k; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00186.html (14,243 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Wonder what these trains were ? (score: 1): Author: RWA325@aol.com; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 23:54:03 -0500 (EST); Pete, If it has a railroad-specific use, in addition to its primary definition in the dictionary, I am one of the woefully uninformed. Bob Arthur In a message dated 1/16/2014 11:35:29 P.M. Eastern St; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00187.html (13,274 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] Wonder what these trains were ? (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth Middleton" <krmiddle@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 08:02:47 -0500; I'm not sure if MAIN is an acronym, but I believe these were troop trains based on some comments in Wayner's "Passenger Train Consists of the 1940s." Best regards, Ken Middleton Portage, MI krmiddle@; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00189.html (15,589 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] Wonder what these trains were ? (score: 1): Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 06:39:16 -0800 (PST); 5620 and 5617 were 4-8-4 steam engines. Such an order would or might have said Extra 5620 and 5617 coupled west would mean a double header. Noel 1/16/2014 5:57 PM, Leo wrote: Copied verbatim is an o; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00190.html (17,007 bytes)
9. Re: [CBQ] Wonder what these trains were ? (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:37:00 -0500 (EST); MAIN is, indeed, an acronym...I'm not sure whether, or if, it would apply to other means of transporting military men and "impedimentia" (how about that word you military guys)...but MAIN was the acr; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00191.html (15,803 bytes)
10. Re: [CBQ] Wonder what these trains were ? (score: 1): Author: Noel Crawford <georgecrawfordsr@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:32:46 -0500; Pete, If your went to Ravenna you went right through my backyard. In 1956 I was a sophomore in York HS. Tracks ran North of the sports field (track, baseball diamond, football practice field) If yo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00192.html (19,769 bytes)
11. Re: [CBQ] Wonder what these trains were ? (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:43:56 -0500 (EST); Noel 1st 43, green signals Engine 9962C August 11, 1956 CF (called for) 11:00pm...departed 12:0lam, Conductor Miller. Arrived Ravenna 2:10am That's a fast run tied up 2:25am. We had an assortment of; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00193.html (20,367 bytes)
12. Re: [CBQ] Wonder what these trains were ? (score: 1): Author: Noel Crawford <georgecrawfordsr@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:30:25 -0500; Pete, Sounds like 9962C was a E8 unit ? Don't have my dismal book handy. Well you did make a flying trip in the middle of the night so I didn't hear you. Probably heard you, but went right back to; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00196.html (27,694 bytes)
13. RE: [CBQ] Wonder what these trains were ? (score: 1): Author: "Harold Huber" <sarge9@bresnan.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:43:45 -0700; All, I do not know what the word for main was, but have very great memories of a troop train in 1965 from El Paso, Tx to Salinas, CA. A steam engine and old heavyweight cars. Was going from Basic to; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00206.html (13,913 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]