- 1. [CBQ] The Great Smoke-Off: M-2 versus M-3 (score: 1)
- Author: "jonathanharris@earthlink.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 26 Jan 2015 16:18:10 -0800
- And here's my other question from the BRHS Freight Car Data Sheet on the Burlington's Composite Gondola Fleet. This is the real head scratcher. In the section about the GA-15 class (the USRA-design g
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-01/msg00196.html (18,712 bytes)
- 2. [CBQ] The Great Smoke-Off: M-2 versus M-3 (score: 1)
- Author: "jonathanharris@earthlink.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 26 Jan 2015 16:21:12 -0800
- And here's my other question from the BRHS Freight Car Data Sheet on the Burlington's Composite Gondola Fleet. This is the real head scratcher. In the section about the GA-15 class (the USRA-design g
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-01/msg00197.html (18,751 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] The Great Smoke-Off: M-2 versus M-3 (score: 1)
- Author: "'John D. Mitchell, Jr.' cbqrr47@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 04:52:31 +0000 (UTC)
- And here's my other question from the BRHS Freight Car Data Sheet on the Burlington's Composite Gondola Fleet. This is the real head scratcher. In the section about the GA-15 class (the USRA-design
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-01/msg00206.html (22,181 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CBQ] The Great Smoke-Off: M-2 versus M-3 (score: 1)
- Author: "jonathanharris@earthlink.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 28 Jan 2015 11:44:33 -0800
- John, thank you for recalling what the Beardstown folk said regarding the different classes of 2-10-2. It sounds like adhesion and/or tractive effort plus familiarity (or unfamiliarity with Southern
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-01/msg00240.html (13,246 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu