- 1. [CBQ] Perfect gentlemen (score: 1)
- Author: "'Rupert & Maureen' gamlenz@ihug.co.nz [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 09:06:52 +1200
- Pete Back in 1921, the Burlington's vice-president announced that the Burlington was conducting a courtesy campaign among its employes. He said "In the management of a property requiring 60,000 emplo
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-05/msg00139.html (11,991 bytes)
- 2. [CBQ] Perfect Gentlemen (score: 1)
- Author: "Leo qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 20:59:54 -0500
- Rupert, There was wide variance between men's language and decorum in frt service and passenger service. Generally passenger men were more reserved,and acted more professional. Part of it was the uni
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-05/msg00145.html (10,696 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] Perfect gentlemen (score: 1)
- Author: "Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 22:19:12 -0400 (EDT)
- Well I guess you could say that..."some were and some weren't"...Some have observed over the years that you can't expect "gentlemanly" conduct when you put a man who has been "rassling boxcars for 40
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-05/msg00146.html (12,741 bytes)
- 4. RE: [CBQ] Perfect gentlemen (score: 1)
- Author: "'Rupert & Maureen' gamlenz@ihug.co.nz [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 14:42:45 +1200
- I should have added that the railwaymen who are members of this List are obviously of the type that the VP was seeking! Rupert Gamlen Auckland NZ| _____ Well I guess you could say that..."some were a
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-05/msg00147.html (12,969 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CBQ] Perfect gentlemen (score: 1)
- Author: "STEVEN HOLDING sholding@sbcglobal.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 19:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
- What about those of the Female gender? Yes there were a few of them too Steve in SC I should have added that the railwaymen who are members of this List are obviously of the type that the VP was s
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-05/msg00149.html (13,306 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CBQ] Perfect gentlemen (score: 1)
- Author: "Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 22:55:33 -0400 (EDT)
- There were no "trainpersons" of the female persuasion during my day. HOWEVER....There was one female crew caller....When you called the "callboy"...She always answered...."CALL GIRL"....I am not maki
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-05/msg00150.html (14,026 bytes)
- 7. RE: [CBQ] Perfect gentlemen (score: 1)
- Author: "'Rupert & Maureen' gamlenz@ihug.co.nz [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 15:01:21 +1200
- The VP was only referring to "gentlemen". My apologies to any ex-railwaywomen who may be reading this. Rupert Gamlen Auckland NZ _____ What about those of the Female gender? Yes there were a few of t
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-05/msg00151.html (13,870 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu