- 1. Re: [BRHSlist] Sheridan's 05 (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed & Betty Padgett" <epadgett@p...>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 08:56:16 -0600
- Bob, I understand where you are coming from, but when I lived out there in the '50's, money was not something that would be easy to raise for any subject. Cattle and tourist were the main source of i
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-03/msg00480.html (10,693 bytes)
- 2. Re: [BRHSlist] Sheridan's 05 (score: 1)
- Author: "Harold S. Huber Jr." <sarge912@h...>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 13:12:06 -0700
- Robert, First, I would like to thank you for putting my photos of #105 WR on your site, I do have photos of the depot and the engine house, if you would like to use them. Second, you must understand
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-03/msg00483.html (7,971 bytes)
- 3. Re: [BRHSlist] Sheridan's 05 (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert Yarger" <ryarger1@n...>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 21:38:10 -0500
- Cosmetic restoration of a steam locomotive does not cost a great deal unless a professional is hired to do the work. A proper job takes a lot of time and elbow grease, but is easily within the skill
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-03/msg00488.html (13,535 bytes)
- 4. Re: [BRHSlist] Sheridan's 05 (score: 1)
- Author: drale99@a...
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:39:38 EST
- If you're going to seal it up and restore its appearance, why remove the asbestos. I would think this would qualify as incapsulation, which could probably be done without certified asbastos removal c
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-03/msg00498.html (6,180 bytes)
- 5. Re: [BRHSlist] Sheridan's 05 (score: 1)
- Author: "Karl L Rethwisch" <karlre@r...>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:27:47 -0700
- The '31 would be an EXCELLENT choice for an O5 to be "saved". It covered more miles in less time that anything I had ever seen in 1957 or, for that matter, ANY TIME. Karl -- -- Original Message -- Fr
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-03/msg00521.html (8,766 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu