Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+No\s+Bills\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+No\s+Bills\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] No Bills (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@p...>; Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 08:23:06 -0500; John, I'm sorry but you do not understand "Storage In Transit". That is the application of inbound billing to outbound movements. With degerulation it is gone now, and it's good riddance. It was terr; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00003.html (11,819 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] No Bills (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@p...>; Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 20:02:10 -0500; John, Your answer implies that the product was reforwarded in it's original form. This was not the case. Basic grains could be turned into flour, malt, starch, or almost any other product. Poles coul; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00018.html (9,013 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] No Bills (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 19:07:59 -0700 (PDT); Russ While some commodities, i.e. grain, etc., were processed "in transit", all commodities were not. This was referred to as "milling in transit", "ginning in transit", "cleaning in transit", etc. a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00019.html (11,118 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] No Bills (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:39:33 -0700 (PDT); No bill cars were also carloads of goods that had not been consigned and/or sold yet, not just cars were seperated from their waybills. When I have the time I'll do a post on the whole "over, short &; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-07/msg00195.html (8,801 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] No Bills (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@p...>; Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 13:59:42 -0500; John, In some ways things have gotten better, in some ways worse. Right now is most common problem with "floaters" is in the plastic pellet business. Solution for that is making them lease a track at; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-07/msg00201.html (11,051 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] No Bills (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 18:45:51 -0700 (PDT); Of course, the coal business got rid of the no-bill car problem with unit trains and long term sales contracts. The "spot market" coal gets stored in silos and other coal storage devices not in railr; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-07/msg00206.html (13,132 bytes)
7. Re: [BRHSlist] No Bills (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@p...>; Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 21:26:27 -0500; Leo, That's right, most of the tracks at Casey and Teague are leased for the storage of plastic loads and empties. What I was refering to was places like Tulsa where some of the shippers tried to use; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-07/msg00209.html (8,172 bytes)
8. Re: [BRHSlist] No Bills (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 20:39:30 -0700 (PDT); I don't want to make things too confusing, but don't get things mixed up. In diversion, the shipper consigns the load (with a bill of lading and a waybill) to themselves at some distant point. Before; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-07/msg00210.html (9,572 bytes)
9. Re: [BRHSlist] No Bills (score: 1): Author: "Steven Holding" <s.holding@c...>; Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 23:14:40 -0600; Sorry Leo I have been clueless for too many years that is why I work where I do sjh -- Original Message -- From: <qutlx1@a...> To: <brhslist@Y...> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 8:52 PM Subject: [B; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-01/msg00017.html (7,844 bytes)
10. Re: [BRHSlist] No Bills (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@e...>; Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 08:15:00 -0600; Leo, Don't know but will forward to someone with more connections in that building. These things can be fixed.; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-01/msg00025.html (8,050 bytes)
11. Re: [BRHSlist] No Bills (score: 1): Author: PSHedgpeth@a...; Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 16:47:49 EST; Leo Your post made me think of something somewhat related, but no direct connection. Anybody remember the JUMBO BOOK. This is not a trick question and is not as obscure as the AUTOMATIC HOBO. Pete [N; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-01/msg00030.html (6,796 bytes)
12. Re: [BRHSlist] No Bills (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 17:52:29 -0800 (PST); Pete I remember the JUMBO Book, but of course, you knew I would! I'll let a few others discuss this important tool of railroad operations. But, I will say this, getting the waybills all in the jumbo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-01/msg00032.html (7,712 bytes)
13. Re: [BRHSlist] No Bills (score: 1): Author: PSHedgpeth@a...; Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 10:43:13 EST; Jumbo Book It was a chore indeed...Greater than the Task of Cycyphus (John...is this the right spelling)..only Lawyers know what said task was. Maintaining the JB was important, but seems like it was; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-01/msg00034.html (6,920 bytes)
14. Re: [BRHSlist] No Bills (score: 1): Author: Bill Chambers <ace1942us@y...>; Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 18:44:25 -0800 (PST); Not necessarily, Pete. I have a B. A. in Modern Languages, and taught for several years, and I am familiar with the Myth of Sisyphus. I don't remember the details, but as I recall the myth, Sisyphus; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-01/msg00036.html (7,719 bytes)
15. Re: [BRHSlist] No Bills (score: 1): Author: PSHedgpeth@a...; Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:21:04 EST; Leo and list You mentioned the matter of wrong AAR ID tags being put on a tank car....and said car showing up in more than one place at the same time... In a few days I'll put on a "classic" tale in; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-01/msg00147.html (7,098 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]