Re: [CBQ] Rapido SW1200

["Nelson Moyer" <npmoyer@hotmail.com>]

Then why are they an outlier? Athearn, P2K’s latest rendition, Stewart/Bowser and occasionally BLI have gotten it right. All I want is ‘in the ballpark’. Rapido isn’t there.

 

Nelson Moyer

 

From: CBQ@groups.io <CBQ@groups.io> On Behalf Of BRIAN PAUL EHNI
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 7:40 PM
To: CBQ groups.io <CBQ@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Rapido SW1200

 

Perhaps because they aren’t prepared to replicate the myriad lighting setups founds on layouts all over the world?

 

 

Thanks!
--

Brian Ehni

 

 

From: "CBQ groups.io" <CBQ@groups.io> on behalf of Nelson Moyer <npmoyer@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: "CBQ groups.io" <CBQ@groups.io>
Date: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 7:15 PM
To: "CBQ groups.io" <CBQ@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Rapido SW1200

 

So why would Rapido use outdoor photographs to select paint for a model that will be viewed under layout lighting? Why can’t they and their consultants get it that we don’t care about how it looks outdoors.

 

Nelson Moyer

 

From: CBQ@groups.io <CBQ@groups.io> On Behalf Of Charlie Vlk
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 6:15 PM
To: CBQ@groups.io
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Rapido SW1200

 

Nelson-

Take one photo of the prototype in your basement under identical lighting conditions…..

or take the photo of the models against the prototype in full sun.   Guarantee the colors will be different. 

The models should not be the same colors…the prototypes certainly were not!

Charlie

 

_._,_._,_

---

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#62493) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nauer.org]

_._,_._,_