Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*CB\&Q\s+F\s+units\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*CB\&Q\s+F\s+units\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. CB&Q F Units (score: 1): Author: railbass@a...; Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 00:04:30 +0000; I would like to thank everyone for their help on the stainless steel panels on the Q E5s and details on the passenger F3s. I have a couple of more questions on Q F units. Looking through the several; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-02/msg00315.html (7,448 bytes)
2. Re: CB&Q F units (score: 1): Author: Denny Anspach <danspach@m...>; Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 16:35:24 -0800; The Milwaukee Road did the very same. The rationale that I have heard is that the smoother "scoop" contours of the passenger pilot, and the coupler cover made it far more difficult to "snag" whatever; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-02/msg00327.html (8,153 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]