Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+signals\s+at\s+Burlington\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+signals\s+at\s+Burlington\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] signals at Burlington (score: 1): Author: Bill Ewinger <bkewinger@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:47:35 -0800 (PST); The south street signal bridge is in the process of being replaced by a new one.If anybody can help i need some help understanding the signal bridge that is going in.the new bridge will have three ro; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-11/msg00175.html (10,411 bytes)
2. RE: [CBQ] signals at Burlington (score: 1): Author: GLEN HAUG <glenehaug@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:56:42 -0800; Bill: The old cantilever (two track cantilever at MP 204.99) only had signals for the two east-west mains. The K-Line along side had ground mount signals as I recall. There was a searchlight approach; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-11/msg00183.html (11,516 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] signals at Burlington (score: 1): Author: Bill Ewinger <bkewinger@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 15:15:29 -0800 (PST); Glen i have somemore pictures to show were the other signal bridge is going and it is also a three light cantilever Bill: The old cantilever (two track cantilever at MP 204.99) only had signals for; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-11/msg00184.html (12,239 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]