Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+What\s+Steam\s+Designs\s+would\s+have\s+worked\s+if\s+the\s+1930\s+GN\/NP\/CB\&Q\s+merger\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+What\s+Steam\s+Designs\s+would\s+have\s+worked\s+if\s+the\s+1930\s+GN\/NP\/CB\&Q\s+merger\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CBQ] What Steam Designs would have worked if the 1930 GN/NP/CB&Q merger... (score: 1): Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 14:57:57 -0400; October 6, 2015 Ken/Gary - I'd venture that the Q/GN/NP would've formed a joint mechanical committee on standardizing as much as possible locomotive, freight car and passenger car equipment to be con; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-10/msg00050.html (17,509 bytes)
2. RE: [CBQ] What Steam Designs would have worked if the 1930 GN/NP/CB&Q merger... (score: 1): Author: "'Charlie Vlk' cvlk@comcast.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 15:17:33 -0500; An interesting topic I think the CB&Q, NP and GN mechanical departments talked to each other and may have been on a more professional basis than other departments in their roads. The GN / NP / CB&Q e; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-10/msg00051.html (17,366 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] What Steam Designs would have worked if the 1930 GN/NP/CB&Q merger... (score: 1): Author: "John Manion railbass@gmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 14:57:52 -0600; October 6, 2015 Ken/Gary - I'd venture that the Q/GN/NP would've formed a joint mechanical committee on standardizing as much as possible locomotive, freight car and passenger car equipment to b; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-10/msg00055.html (19,537 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]