- 1. Re: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? [2 Attachments] (score: 1)
- Author: "BRIAN PAUL EHNI bpehni@gmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 14:52:51 -0600
- February 3, 2015 Group - 4004 was easy. Now, "what's wrong" with Class O-1 No. 5030 shown (inserted/attached) on the ready track in Denver, CO, on August 20, 1938? All I can say is that appearances c
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00024.html (14,671 bytes)
- 2. RE: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? [2 Attachments] (score: 1)
- Author: "Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 08:30:14 -0700
- As far as I can see, there's absolutely nothing wrong with the 5030. No, it does not have an L&B front end, but that does not mean it's not a lignite burner, which in fact it is, as identified by the
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00036.html (19,455 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? [2 Attachments] (score: 1)
- Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 14:30:11 -0500
- February 4, 2015 Hol, Jonathan, Charlie and other Group members who participated in this discussion - Well, again, Hol has nailed it. What was "wrong," or perhaps "unusual" with 5030 to me, was its c
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00042.html (23,376 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? [2 Attachments] (score: 1)
- Author: "'John D. Mitchell, Jr.' cbqrr47@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 19:40:52 +0000 (UTC)
- February 4, 2015 Hol, Jonathan, Charlie and other Group members who participated in this discussion - Well, again, Hol has nailed it. What was "wrong," or perhaps "unusual" with 5030 to me, was its
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00043.html (26,215 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu