Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Walthers\s+10\-6\s+accuracy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Walthers\s+10\-6\s+accuracy\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Walthers 10-6 accuracy (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <cz17@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:45:14 -0500; The Budd Walthers 10-6 is accurate for the Union Pacific PACIFIC series sleepers - they will be rerun as part of the City train promotion. It is very close to the 1952 CB&Q order of cars, though with; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-10/msg00001.html (10,618 bytes)
2. [CBQ] Walthers 10-6 accuracy (score: 1): Author: "RobertN" <gfandwrr@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:52:51 -0600; Several years ago, Walthers released their 10-6 sleeper in many road names. I was wondering how accurate it is for the 10-6's in the Calif Zephyr? Robert Nelson -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit yo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-09/msg00094.html (9,734 bytes)
3. RE: [CBQ] Walthers 10-6 accuracy (score: 1): Author: Rick Keil <rkeil6721@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:28:16 -0500; The BLI version is more accurate. The Walthers Budd cars lack full skirting. Ricky _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don?t worry abo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-09/msg00095.html (10,706 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]