Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Stainless\s+Steel\s+Sides\s+on\s+Q\s+E\-Units\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Stainless\s+Steel\s+Sides\s+on\s+Q\s+E\-Units\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Stainless Steel Sides on Q E-Units (score: 1): Author: "hjebone" <stu5632@everestkc.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:53:36 -0600; I am told this question is answered in one of the BRHS' Bulletins, but since my collection is incomplete, would throw this out for a short answer. Why did some of the Burlington E-7s and E-8s have th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-01/msg00121.html (9,750 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Stainless Steel Sides on Q E-Units (score: 1): Author: "Russ Strodtz" <borneo@19main.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:52:10 -0600; E7's in general, as they got older, lost the side panels. They were not considered as necessary and as they got older and needed work it was just left off. That saved money and time. -- Yahoo! Groups; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-01/msg00123.html (10,583 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]