Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+XAP\s+vs\s+XML\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+XAP\s+vs\s+XML\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: XAP vs XML (score: 1): Author: "Gerald A. Edgar" <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:46:18 -0600; Will ck in my OER's for those yrs when I get home tonight. As i recall the governing RR mechanical body that sets specs was clarifying due to the many changes in Box car's in the 60's, especially in; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-10/msg00064.html (9,901 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Re: XAP vs XML (score: 1): Author: "Rupert and Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:28:23 +1300; Gerald Thanks for the response. The ARA Mechanical Designation of XAP was used in the November 1966 ORER and had changed to XP by May 1967, and similarly XML had changed to XL . So why did CB&Q chang; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-10/msg00068.html (10,336 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]