Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Train\/car\s+bridges\?\s+was\s+Re\:\s+Burlington\s+Railroad\s+Bridge\,\s+now\s+fount\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Train\/car\s+bridges\?\s+was\s+Re\:\s+Burlington\s+Railroad\s+Bridge\,\s+now\s+fount\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Train/car bridges? was Re: Burlington Railroad Bridge, now fount (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Harding" <dharding@nethtc.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:33:21 -0500; Actually Michael, the carbon paper used for train orders was double sided. Thus the order was copied on both sides of the flimsie, a mirror image on the back side. And you are correct the order could; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00284.html (11,187 bytes)
2. [CBQ] Re: Train/car bridges? was Re: Burlington Railroad Bridge, now fount (score: 1): Author: wohrnell@sbcglobal.net; Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:56:05 -0700 (PDT); Roy, The form 19 were green and were used for routine train orders, the form 31 were yellow and were used for restricted orders, they had to be signed for by the train crew(s) they were issued to. Th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00285.html (10,880 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]