Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Proto\s+2000\s+CB\&Q\s+0\-6\-0\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Proto\s+2000\s+CB\&Q\s+0\-6\-0\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Proto 2000 CB&Q 0-6-0 (score: 1): Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:31:04 -0600; Cy, The one shown, of course, is Pennsy. Hopefully, they will provide the correct tender on the Q version. Bill Barber Gravois Mills, MO [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Yahoo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-01/msg00114.html (10,384 bytes)
2. [CBQ] Re: Proto 2000 CB&Q 0-6-0 (score: 1): Author: "califconure" <jonathanharris@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:56:58 -0600; They got the tender pretty much right on the original (DC) run; no reason to think they'll do it wrong this time. As for other railroad-specific details,... well, to some extent. Maybe. You'll probab; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-01/msg00116.html (13,138 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]