Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Flagg\s+Center\s+to\s+Savanna\s+Mainline\,\s+and\s+other\s+similar\s+segments\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Flagg\s+Center\s+to\s+Savanna\s+Mainline\,\s+and\s+other\s+similar\s+segments\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Flagg Center to Savanna Mainline, and other similar segments (score: 1): Author: "Richard Eisfeller" <bigeee@trainvideos.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:29:27 -0400; By the early 1950s with the longer trains with diesels (and the siding extensions with CTC) , the C&I had only three through freight trains each way, not enough traffic to require double tracking eve; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-11/msg00007.html (10,696 bytes)
2. [CBQ] Re: Flagg Center to Savanna Mainline, and other similar segments (score: 1): Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:30:49 -0500; Glen, Q's decisions concerning the C&I obviously worked. During the '40s and '50s, some of the fastest scheduled passenger operations in the country, occurred on that line. As I recall, some of those; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-11/msg00008.html (14,254 bytes)
3. [CBQ] Re: Flagg Center to Savanna Mainline, and other similar segments (score: 1): Author: "pal_houston" <paulaleonard08@att.net>; Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 19:04:49 -0600; -- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, William Barber <clipperw@...> wrote:>> ... That required > running at more than 100 MPH. It seems like Oregon to Rochelle was > the really fast area.> > Bill Barber> Gravoi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-11/msg00010.html (10,624 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]