Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Challenger\s+2\-10\-2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Challenger\s+2\-10\-2\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Challenger 2-10-2 (score: 1): Author: "nycbqfan" <jsauer@estee.com>; Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 22:57:30 -0600; I have purchased that piece, as well as the Challenger O5 and S4. They are all state of the art models. The finish is exquisite and they run well. They are also delicate and fragile and require some; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-05/msg00085.html (8,705 bytes)
2. [CBQ] Re: Challenger 2-10-2 (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@earthlink.net; Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 10:11:44 -0700; I second John's comments. The level of detail -- both accuracy and precision -- is remarkable. The state of the art certainly has advanced in the years since I bought my last "new" brass steam locomo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-05/msg00086.html (9,939 bytes)
3. [CBQ] Re: Challenger 2-10-2 (score: 1): Author: "portin2002" <slumax@iprimus.com.au>; Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 01:48:39 -0600; Hello, Just a couple of questions for those that have this locomotive. What would be the minimum curve radius that it would comfortably run on and is it easily convertible for DCC operation? Thanks a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-05/msg00128.html (8,659 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Re: Challenger 2-10-2 (score: 1): Author: CILTRAINS@aol.com; Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 10:30:15 EDT; The Challenger 2-10-2 CB&Q M2A's successfully operate on our 24" radius test fixture. For those with a basic understanding of DCC and the requisite skills for installation, this application should pr; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-05/msg00130.html (8,322 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]