Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+C\&I\s+double\s+trk\-was\s+Q\s+physical\s+plant\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+C\&I\s+double\s+trk\-was\s+Q\s+physical\s+plant\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Fwd: [CBQ] Re: C&I double trk-was Q physical plant (score: 1): Author: qutlx1@aol.com; Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:14:05 -0500 (EST); Mitch, I have never heard any mention of double tracking the C&I. But that doesnt mean it wasnt studied. Theres been some discussion here about line changes and grade reduction and I have at least on; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-01/msg00123.html (19,070 bytes)
2. RE: [CBQ] Re: C&I double trk-was Q physical plant (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:43:26 -0600; Leo- I have a drawing for the Shabbona single stall enginehouse which I’d be glad to share for the article. Charlie Vlk __._,_.___ Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-01/msg00161.html (11,998 bytes)
3. Fwd: [CBQ] Re: C&I double trk-was Q physical plant (score: 1): Author: qutlx1@aol.com; Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:52:53 -0500 (EST); Thanks Charlie, I have also responded off list as this is really a BRHS discussion. Thanks again and it appears society members are in for quite a treat betwen the 2 articles and you're drawing Leo P; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-01/msg00169.html (15,167 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]