Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+RPO\s+structural\s+requirements\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+RPO\s+structural\s+requirements\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CBQ] RPO structural requirements (score: 1): Author: RWA325@aol.com; Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:09:35 -0400 (EDT); In a message dated 6/3/2013 1:56:04 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, gamlenz@ihug.co.nz writes: Hol Thanks for the clarification on the RPO strength requirements. Rupert From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-08/msg00035.html (26,564 bytes)
2. [CBQ] RPO structural requirements (score: 1): Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 13:47:32 +1200; Re. truss rods and RPO’s. I’ve had a quick look on the internet but can’t find anything specific other than - “In 1912, the Railway Mail Service developed a set of strength re; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-06/msg00019.html (23,086 bytes)
3. RE: [CBQ] RPO structural requirements (score: 1): Author: HOL WAGNER <holpennywagner@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 07:15:15 -0600; Existing cars were not immediately impacted by the strength requirements and many continued in service on wooden underframes/steel center sills with truss rods for a number of years. Only the ends of; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-06/msg00024.html (24,555 bytes)
4. RE: [CBQ] RPO structural requirements (score: 1): Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 08:55:58 +1200; Hol Thanks for the clarification on the RPO strength requirements. Rupert From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CBQ@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of HOL WAGNER Sent: Tuesday, 4 June 2013 1:15 a.m. To: CB&Q; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-06/msg00031.html (27,151 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] RPO structural requirements (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 16:49:18 -0500; Rupert, the specifications varied by era, and can be found in the Post Office Publication 19 "A Publication of the Post Ofice department" "Specification for the Construction of Fulll and Apartment Ra; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-06/msg00032.html (18,933 bytes)
6. RE: [CBQ] RPO structural requirements (score: 1): Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 15:53:55 +1200; Bob Thanks for the information. As the subject appears to be rather complex, I’ll need to do some more digging and post a time line for the changes. Rupert From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CBQ; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-06/msg00035.html (17,396 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]