Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Plum\s+River\s+\-\s+Location\s+of\s+Galesburg\s+Line\s+Switch\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Plum\s+River\s+\-\s+Location\s+of\s+Galesburg\s+Line\s+Switch\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Plum River - Location of Galesburg Line Switch (score: 1): Author: "zephyr98072" <glenehaug@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:33:36 -0600; I'm looking for a fairly precise location of the point of switch from the Galesburg line to the Savanna line in 60's, when the line from Galesburg was truncated at Plum River. Is there anyone on the; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-01/msg00145.html (10,269 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Plum River - Location of Galesburg Line Switch (score: 1): Author: "Russ Strodtz" <borneo@19main.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:40:32 -0600; Glen, Don't know what you mean by "truncated". YL 53.005 GT-SAV MP 53.31 end GT-SAV MP 142.33 AUR-SAV Plum River is a river at Bridge 142.35, AUR-SAV. MP 142.89 AUR DIV to LX LINE Russ -- Yahoo! Grou; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-01/msg00146.html (10,997 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Plum River - Location of Galesburg Line Switch (score: 1): Author: "Russ Strodtz" <borneo@19main.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:45:06 -0600; Glen, Suppose I should say this: While bridge could have been double track, (and now is), it was only single track in 1965. Switch was right at the east end of the bridge. -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*>; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-01/msg00147.html (11,107 bytes)
4. RE: [CBQ] Plum River - Location of Galesburg Line Switch (score: 1): Author: GLEN HAUG <glenehaug@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:59:46 -0800; "Truncated" was a poor choice of words. I should have said shortened. The lines from Galesburg and Aurora originally (from 1904 on) paralleled each other from the Plum River bridge into Savanna where; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-01/msg00178.html (13,947 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Plum River - Location of Galesburg Line Switch (score: 1): Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:33:21 -0800 (PST); Glen I think '64 would have been during the CTC project and the Plum River Switch to the Peavine was powered under the CTC CTC did not come to the Peavine until the '80s Railroad operations are full; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-01/msg00179.html (14,443 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]