- 1. [CBQ] Further To May Be C&S (score: 1)
- Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:06:30 -0400
- July 30, 2015 Hol - Again, Yahoo doesn't want my attachment. So, let me insert the image of the (may be) C&S wood box car and the tank car being off loaded: Best Regards - Louis Louis Zadnichek II Fa
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-07/msg00182.html (12,011 bytes)
- 2. RE: [CBQ] Further To May Be C&S (score: 1)
- Author: "Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:12:32 -0600
- It's not a C&S car; probably C&EI or even C&NW. Hol To: cbq@yahoogroups.com From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:06:30 -0400 Subject: [CBQ] Further To May Be C&S July 30, 2015 Hol - Ag
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-07/msg00188.html (13,291 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] Further To May Be C&S (score: 1)
- Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:05:04 -0400
- July 31, 2015 Hol - Thanks for clarifying that the box car is not C&S. Best Regards - Louis In a message dated 7/30/2015 8:12:41 P.M. Central Daylight Time, CBQ@yahoogroups.com writes: It's not a C&S
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-07/msg00194.html (13,249 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu