- 1. Re: [CBQ] Digest Number 2591 (score: 1)
- Author: clipperw@EarthLink.net
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:01:56 -0600
- Bob, In the later years, (after Q closed the reclamation plant at Eola), most, if not all, of the Lincoln assigned locomotives were scrapped at Sterling, IL. I have a sad slide, taken in Illinois, of
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-11/msg00174.html (10,588 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CBQ] Digest Number 2591 (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Yarger" <ryarger@rypn.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:16:15 -0500
- It would be nice if you could somehow post those photos. I know slide posting is a bit more complicated than just photos, but you have some interesting material. I've heard the 5620 was held as a pos
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-11/msg00175.html (11,460 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] Digest Number 2591 (score: 1)
- Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:26:43 -0600
- Bill, What is also interesting is that many of those tenders were never used for anything. By the mid sixties they were being sent up to Sterling in pairs. A little bit of wasted labor there but I ca
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-11/msg00176.html (10,756 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CBQ] Digest Number 2591 (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Martin <kmartin@cwia.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:00:45 -0800
- I took a picture of MW tender 205645 which had six wheel trucks and an oil bunker. I don't know if it was an O-5 or S-4. I saw two tenders someone had scraped paint off to show the original no. and t
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-11/msg00178.html (10,114 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu