Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+CB\&Q\s+commuter\s+consist\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+CB\&Q\s+commuter\s+consist\s+question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] CB&Q commuter consist question (score: 1): Author: "Supplement" <supplementless@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:38:13 -0600; I have seen several photos of commuter trains that show the single level cars combined with the "new" bi-level cars. However the bi-level cars are always trailing. Is this by chance or by design. If; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-10/msg00063.html (10,096 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q commuter consist question (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:03:17 EDT; A question like this came up a while ago and should be in the archives. The "single level" car was a power car - a car with a generator - since the E Units did not get HEP until the 1970's and the bi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-10/msg00064.html (11,202 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q commuter consist question (score: 1): Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:02:15 +1300; There was also an article in Bulletin #4 Rupert Gamlen Auckland NZ -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Indivi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-10/msg00067.html (10,558 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]