Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+CB\&Q\s+MP15\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+CB\&Q\s+MP15\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] CB&Q MP15 (score: 1): Author: railbass@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:52:59 +0000 (UTC); I often check Caboose Hobbies' website for CB&Q/D&RGW models which are available or coming up and noted something quite irregular today. They listed a Con-Cor CB&Q MP15, numbered 576 or 580, painted; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00312.html (10,562 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q MP15 (score: 1): Author: "Russ Strodtz" <normansen@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:00:59 -0500; MP15's ?? I think the BN got four units that had been built by the SLSF. Other than that, no. Models are models, locomotives are locomotives, often are not the same. -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To vis; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00313.html (11,564 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q MP15 (score: 1): Author: lyle dowell <slyone@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:08:39 -0500; Con-Cor did a series of models in wat I think they called the "Railbaron" series where some (all?) were fantasy schemes. The did a Q MP15. Maybe we're getting spoiled, but it use to be normal for a l; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00314.html (12,441 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q MP15 (score: 1): Author: Michael Matalis <mmatalis@sprynet.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:11:45 -0500; Manufacturers often times get a little "over creative" with applying road scheme. Athearn was notorious for this in the 60's and 70's, I seem to remember them offering a Chinese red DD35A at one time; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00315.html (12,862 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]