Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+CB\&Q\s+\+\s+AT\&SF\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+CB\&Q\s+\+\s+AT\&SF\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] CB&Q + AT&SF (score: 1): Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 19:56:41 +1200; The current "amalgamation" of the CB&Q and AT&SF (plus a couple of other companies) might have had a precedent in May 1875 when the Engineering News reported: It a current topic of talk in railroad c; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-08/msg00015.html (10,472 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q + AT&SF (score: 1): Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 01:23:12 -0700 (PDT); Greetings Everyone. The date of 1875 does suprise me a little; it is very early. I am not sure if the top brass of the ATSF were indeed ex"Q" men in 1875. WB Strong and others joined the ATSF later (; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-08/msg00016.html (12,846 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]