Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Answer\s+to\s+Grade\s+Improvements\s+on\s+the\s+Q\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Answer\s+to\s+Grade\s+Improvements\s+on\s+the\s+Q\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [CBQ] Answer to Grade Improvements on the Q (score: 1): Author: GLEN HAUG <glenehaug@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:29:05 -0700; I never saw such a letter either, but I believe I can somewhat answer the questions as to the grades that Hill may have been talking about. Certainly he would have included the H&StJ main across nort; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-03/msg00097.html (15,214 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Answer to Grade Improvements on the Q (score: 1): Author: "cvlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:29:01 -0500; Based on articles gleaned from the Chicago Tribune, a 1890 lawsuit before the Illinois State Railroad and Warehouse Commission, the original grade of the CB&Q main between West Grossdale (Congress Pa; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-03/msg00101.html (13,297 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]