Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+ATC\s+Equipped\s+Class\s+S\-1\-A\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+ATC\s+Equipped\s+Class\s+S\-1\-A\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CBQ] ATC Equipped Class S-1-A? (score: 1): Author: "Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 21:22:08 +0000; is: I checked assignment sheets, and 2838, assigned to the Chicago Division, first shows as being equipped with cab signals (which is what the box is for on the S-4s and O-5s, plus a good many Geeps; /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-01/msg00178.html (16,224 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] ATC Equipped Class S-1-A? (score: 1): Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 16:32:55 -0500; January 25, 2017 Hol - Thanks for confirming. Would you care to venture "why" a suburban service 4-6-2 was so equipped? Particularly since 2838 was one-of-a-kind. It would've been expensive to retrof; /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-01/msg00180.html (15,744 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]