Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+\+Re\:\s+handling\s+old\s+train\s+orders\s+for\s+archival\s+purposes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+\+Re\:\s+handling\s+old\s+train\s+orders\s+for\s+archival\s+purposes\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [CBQ] +Re: handling old train orders for archival purposes (score: 1): Author: "Grice Dale-MGI1833" <dgrice@motorola.com>; Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 08:50:07 -0400; Archie, Regular copy paper would not be good. Also, to eliminate finger oils, use white cotton gloves. I get my archival products from the following. http://www.universityproducts.com/main2.html <htt; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-05/msg00014.html (11,774 bytes)
2. [CBQ] +Re: handling old train orders for archival purposes (score: 1): Author: "andrew koetz" <andrewkoetz@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:28:22 -0500; Lets say it appears that dad just "tossed" these T.O.s into a box, "no rhyme or reason" to keep them organized. Some look like they have almost been "wadded up" into a ball and tossed into the box. D; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00329.html (10,285 bytes)
3. [CBQ] +Re: handling old train orders for archival purposes (score: 1): Author: "andrew koetz" <andrewkoetz@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:30:43 -0500; Thanks Mike. I just wanted to get some info from members on handling these "fragile" pieces of paper before doing so. Would regular copy paper work for the acid levels, or should I look for something; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00330.html (9,687 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]