Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Hamiltons\s+vs\.\s+Balls\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Hamiltons\s+vs\.\s+Balls\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Hamiltons vs. Balls (score: 1): Author: "Mike Decker" <mdecker@g...>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 16:32:45 -0600; Karl and folks: My working watch is an Elgin "B. W. Raymond", 21 jewel, lever set. Keeps good time. My back-up is a Walthem, 17-jewel stem-set....almost as accurate as the Elgin. Most guys out here t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00007.html (7,621 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Hamiltons vs. Balls (score: 1): Author: amtrak347@a...; Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 12:25:10 EDT; As I recall, you had one take a stroll down the "catwalk" of an SD-45 at about 50MPH somewhere on the East End, when it became detached from its chain. Correct me if I'm wrong. My 992B was purchased; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00017.html (6,948 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Hamiltons vs. Balls (score: 1): Author: "Karl L Rethwisch" <karlre@r...>; Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 06:50:02 -0600; Your memory isn't too bad. The poor ol' watch did travel for quite a distance along the running board and was prevented from going over the edge by carefully placing a boot in its path. The case of t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00019.html (8,484 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Hamiltons vs. Balls (score: 1): Author: "Karl L Rethwisch" <karlre@r...>; Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 12:24:12 -0600; As a user, rather than a collector, of RR watches I can make an absolute statement concerning the Hamilton, it was (it's retired) the most rugged, reliable keeper of time that I've ever owned. "It" i; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-05/msg00212.html (7,773 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]