- 1. Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1622 (score: 1)
- Author: William Barber <clipperw@E...>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:00:30 -0600
- Q 6313 is a 2-10-4, not a 2-10-2 and was built in 1927, possibly newer then the time period Scott is referencing. Obviously, No. 6313 looks considerably different than Q's M-1 and M-2 2-10-2s. Bill B
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-03/msg00173.html (7,556 bytes)
- 2. Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1622 (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Millick <smillick@w...>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:09:16 -0600
- I can send a pix of this to anyone who wants it direct and can take the 2.3 m file Bill Barber <http://www.rr-fallenflags.org/cbq/cbq-6313abn.jpg>http://www.rr-fallenflags.org/cbq/cbq-6313abn.jpg Yah
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-03/msg00174.html (8,338 bytes)
- 3. Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1622 (score: 1)
- Author: "Jan Kohl" <jkohl@n...>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:57:21 -0500
- yes, please! :) Cheers! I can send a pix of this to anyone who wants it direct and can take the 2.3 m file Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-03/msg00187.html (8,580 bytes)
- 4. Re: [BRHSlist] Digest Number 1622 (score: 1)
- Author: "Jan Kohl" <jkohl@n...>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 19:01:05 -0500
- Ooops...sorry folks, didn't mean to jet that to the list... Cheers! yes, please! :) Cheers! I can send a pix of this to anyone who wants it direct and can take the 2.3 m file At 10:00 PM 3/10/2003 -0
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-03/msg00188.html (9,047 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu