Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+CNW\s+highlevels\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+CNW\s+highlevels\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] CNW highlevels (score: 1): Author: amtrak347@a...; Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:26:16 EST; My understanding is they turned at Quincy. Bob; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-11/msg00231.html (6,682 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] CNW highlevels (score: 1): Author: amtrak347@a...; Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:29:41 EST; You don't need it. Bob [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-11/msg00232.html (6,958 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] CNW highlevels (score: 1): Author: locoeng@a...; Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 23:53:18 EST; Darren, I was set back to fireman on train #347 #346 #348 for five months in the time when we had the X-CNW equipment. I worked old mainline between Galesburg, Chicago and return. I also made many tr; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-11/msg00239.html (8,380 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] CNW highlevels (score: 1): Author: "Steven Holding" <s.holding@c...>; Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 23:34:49 -0600; They Turned sjh Not quite the Q era I realize. When the ex CNW highlevels ran from Chicago to Quincy was that a push pull operation or did the train get turned in Quincy? I am trying to decide if I n; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-11/msg00241.html (6,919 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] CNW highlevels (score: 1): Author: Paul/Celine Kossart <kozys@t...>; Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:59:16 -0600; I was set back to fireman on train #347 #346 #348 for five months in the time when we had the X-CNW equipment. I worked old mainline between Galesburg, Chicago and return. I also made many trips as; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-11/msg00321.html (9,215 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] CNW highlevels (score: 1): Author: locoeng@a...; Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 23:04:21 EST; Getting old isn't easy, I can't find my old timebooks, I think about 1974 or so. Ron Copher [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-11/msg00323.html (6,855 bytes)
7. Re: [BRHSlist] CNW highlevels (score: 1): Author: "Tom Barrett" <barrett@g...>; Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 01:10:30 -0600; I hired out in firing September 1973, had to make a student trip to W/Quincy on Amtrak, they still had the CNW equipment on 347 and 348 at that time, can't remember if made it in the fall or made it; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-11/msg00325.html (7,655 bytes)
8. Re: [BRHSlist] CNW highlevels (score: 1): Author: "William Franckey" <budapest@g...>; Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 11:04:31 -0600; List, Burlington Northern passenger, although tattered was still Q and Budd equiptment. As a fireman a on the X list and barely able to hold Galesburg, the remaining passenger service was a lifesaver; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-11/msg00326.html (13,447 bytes)
9. Re: [BRHSlist] CNW highlevels (score: 1): Author: cttnghmrl@a...; Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:23:27 EST; I have a couple of slides taken 24 November 1978 at Montgomery of number 348 being pulled by Amtrak 715 with three high level cars. The cars are painted in Amtrak colors, but they do have center door; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-11/msg00327.html (6,957 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]