Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Billboard\s+Reefers\s+and\s+Frisco\s+depots\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Billboard\s+Reefers\s+and\s+Frisco\s+depots\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Billboard Reefers and Frisco depots (score: 1): Author: ufffam@a...; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 13:53:08 EDT; << It is my understanding that the beautiful old "billboard reefers" which used to grace the freight trains of this country met their demise when the United States Supreme Court declared them illegal; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-07/msg00103.html (7,283 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Billboard Reefers and Frisco depots (score: 1): Author: ufffam@a...; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 17:04:25 EDT; Bill: This has also got fudged a little. I recall the GTW had some cars that had small, but still readable, cereal company logos on them. Russ Wonder if they were in captive service for the cereal co; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-07/msg00110.html (7,239 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Billboard Reefers and Frisco depots (score: 1): Author: Smithsurprise@a...; Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:05:22 EDT; Although I can't cite the document I believe the gist of the decision was that the availability of advertising on the side of a reefer provided an unfair competitive advantage. Regards, Don; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-07/msg00119.html (6,501 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Billboard Reefers and Frisco depots (score: 1): Author: marshall <zephyr03@s...>; Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 19:22:30 -0500; I don't have a law library either, but the basic reasoning was that smaller manufacturers could be forced to ship their products inside a competitor's advertising, and that this constituted an unfair; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-07/msg00123.html (7,188 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]