Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Any\s+Others\?\s+$was\s+KATO\s+SD40\,\s+CB\&Q\s+or\s+C\&S\?$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Any\s+Others\?\s+$was\s+KATO\s+SD40\,\s+CB\&Q\s+or\s+C\&S\?$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Any Others? (was KATO SD40, CB&Q or C&S?) (score: 1): Author: Paul/Celine Kossart <kozys@t...>; Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 18:44:47 -0600; So far, we have established that: the Q did not operate any SD40s the C&S did Kato identified their model as a Burlington SD40, fooling all the non-devotees And it has also been stated the CB&Q didn; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-03/msg00032.html (7,799 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Any Others? (was KATO SD40, CB&Q or C&S?) (score: 1): Author: Ken martin <kmartin@c...>; Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 17:54:15 -0800; Paul It would be easier to list the engines the Q had. there is a roster on the societies web page at: http://www.burlingtonroute.com/rosters/droster/diesel.htm Also member Eric Jacobsen has a roster; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-03/msg00034.html (7,557 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Any Others? (was KATO SD40, CB&Q or C&S?) (score: 1): Author: "M. Thayer" <zephyr@k...>; Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 21:34:14 -0600; no The Q *did* have SD-45s (516-530) delivered in January 1969 . . . but they were in the experimental BN scheme of black/white/green with white zebra stripes on the short hood. The battery boxes bor; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-03/msg00037.html (7,976 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]