Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mytrainstuff@gmail.com: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CBQ] Fw: New Elk mine above Trinidad to open (score: 1)
Author: mytrain stuff <mytrainstuff@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 13:43:52 -0500
How will these movements effect the BNSF route maintained just for Amtrak's Southwest Chief? I know the general geography but I have trouble superimposing the railroad. Bernie [Non-text portions of t
/archives/BRHSLIST/2010-07/msg00105.html (11,243 bytes)

2. Re: [CBQ] EB & NCL Running Same Schedule Aurora to St Paul 1935 (score: 1)
Author: Bernie Lyngdal <mytrainstuff@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:28:16 -0600
More likely one was a second section to the other, dispatcher's option which one lead to parade.    They also each had their own train number (same as home road GN or NP).        On Saturday, Novemb
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-12/msg00034.html (13,494 bytes)

3. [CBQ] EB & NCL Running Same Schedule Aurora to St Paul 1935 (score: 1)
Author: <mytrainstuff@gmail.com>
Date: 30 Nov 2013 12:04:03 -0800
Some weeks ago, I asked how two separate trains could run on the same schedule and not be running as sections. No answer. I've located my 1935 Q schedule which shows the NCL out of Chicago at 10:30 P
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00163.html (11,098 bytes)

4. [CBQ] NCL and EB Running (score: 1)
Author: mytrainstuff stuff <mytrainstuff@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:16:00 -0500
Back in the early '40's, when I was a fairly young boy, my parents and I often traveled on the TZ between Chicago and East Dubuque.  I can recall a night when the Afternoon TZ was a bit late arriving
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-10/msg00128.html (11,254 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu