Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:clipperw@gmail.com: 728 ]

Total 728 documents matching your query.

101. [CBQ] Re:Re: new locomotives and cost (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 08:58:59 -0600
Re: new locomotives and cost Posted by: "ANDREW KOETZ" andrewkoetz@gmail.com andrewkoetz Fri Dec 2, 2011 10:01 pm (PST) Andrew, I not sure what prompted your post. It appears that the actual content
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00012.html (22,212 bytes)

102. Re: [CBQ] Re:Re: new locomotives and cost (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 22:06:17 -0600
Jason, Great list for the period, but you might want to ad a couple more. These would include Union Pacific, Chicago & Northwestern, Western Pacific, Katy, Missouri Pacific, Rock Island (it didn't de
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00016.html (12,463 bytes)

103. [CBQ] Re:Re: new locomotives and cost (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 13:06:53 -0600
Re: new locomotives and cost Posted by: "Cy Svobodny" ctsvobodny@yahoo.com ctsvobodny Sat Dec 3, 2011 9:12 pm (PST) Cy, That is correct, today, but in the time period identified of 1980, DM&IR was st
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00020.html (14,261 bytes)

104. [CBQ] Re: new locomotives and cost (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 09:35:05 -0600
Re: new locomotives and cost Posted by: "Patrick P" dblp1@yahoo.com dblp1 Sun Dec 4, 2011 6:13 pm (PST) Patrick, The same thing was true when the Q merged into the Burlington Northern except that the
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00029.html (14,757 bytes)

105. [CBQ] Re: new locomotives and cost (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 09:08:48 -0600
Re: new locomotives and cost Posted by: "archie hayden" kliner@mywdo.com archieh1946 Mon Dec 5, 2011 4:08 pm (PST) Archie, While my earliest responsibilities with the BN date from 1971, most of my ea
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00048.html (15,566 bytes)

106. [CBQ] Re: further question about assignments of #9903 (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 09:18:29 -0600
Re: further question about assignments of #9903 Posted by: "HOL WAGNER" holpennywagner@msn.com fhw632 Mon Dec 5, 2011 1:24 pm (PST) Hol, Unfortunately, it was unprotected and badly vandalized while i
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00049.html (15,571 bytes)

107. [CBQ] Re: further question about assignments of #9903 (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 08:13:11 -0600
Re: further question about assignments of #9903 Posted by: "Randy Gordon-Gilmore" randy@prototrains.com proto_trains Tue Dec 6, 2011 8:20 pm (PST) Randy, Is 9903 at Mid America Car in Kansas City? I
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00058.html (16,312 bytes)

108. [CBQ] Re: further question about assignments of #9903 (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 18:15:18 -0600
Re: further question about assignments of #9903 Re: further question about assignments of #9903 Posted by: "Dave Lotz" Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net dave_lotz Posted by: "Bryan Howell" tubaman21@yahoo.com
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00079.html (21,239 bytes)

109. [CBQ] Re:Winton Engines (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:43:58 -0600
Winton Engines Posted by: "ANDREW KOETZ" andrewkoetz@gmail.com andrewkoetz Sat Dec 10, 2011 6:12 pm (PST) Andrew, As someone else mentioned, parts is the big issue. Neither EMD nor anyone else has pa
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00089.html (15,931 bytes)

110. [CBQ] Re: E7 9949 (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:05:18 -0600
E7 9949 Posted by: "Duncan Cameron" d.cameron@sympatico.ca cbqguy1 Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:58 pm (PST) Duncan, It may have been assigned Hannibal as "protection" power for the trains that ran through the
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-12/msg00110.html (14,380 bytes)

111. [CBQ] Re:Double Drum heads on Observation Cars (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:35:38 -0600
Keith, You have received several responses to your question concerning lightweight streamlined equipment, but the double drum heads was not limited to those cars. Early in the 20th century, Q passeng
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-11/msg00115.html (11,378 bytes)

112. [CBQ] Re: Olympus Scrapped (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:31:58 -0600
Re: Olympus Scrapped Posted by: "Dave Lotz" Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net dave_lotz Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:20 am (PST) Dave, The Q once sent some Great Northern F units to EMD for trade in including one A unit
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-11/msg00195.html (13,785 bytes)

113. [CBQ] Re: Steam Generators on GPs/SDs (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 10:56:13 -0500
Jack, You are correct about the covers which were not part of the EMD application, but rather a RR added modification. I don't know about incidences on the Q, but the Duluth Missabe & Iron Range had
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-10/msg00110.html (12,451 bytes)

114. [CBQ] Re:Layouts or Q Related Stuff Around Minneapolis (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 08:50:30 -0500
Tom, Be sure to make time to see the Twin Cities Model Railroad Museum at Bandana Square in St. Paul. They have a very nice O scale model railroad among other model railroads that depicts the St. Pau
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-09/msg00019.html (12,449 bytes)

115. [CBQ] Re: C&S 2-8-0s #69, 70 (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 08:45:57 -0500
Pete, As Ken Martin notes, the current WP&Y #69 is not C&S $69. The current locomotive was built for the WP&Y by Baldwin in 1908. It was retired in 1954, sold to the Black Hills Central in 1956, sold
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-08/msg00074.html (11,979 bytes)

116. [CBQ] Re: Drop Steps On Diesels (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:34:01 -0500
Steve, Your comments are absolutely correct. In the EMD production process, each model had a standard drawing list; the basic locomotive for which there was a price. Any changes desired by the custom
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-08/msg00081.html (14,822 bytes)

117. [CBQ] Re: Bulletin (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 07:51:19 -0500
Mine arrived, yesterday, in central Missouri. Another great Job by all of those involved. I am looking forward to part two as I read through part 1. Bill Barber Gravois Mills, MO [Non-text portions o
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-08/msg00105.html (10,630 bytes)

118. [CBQ] Re: Drop Steps On Diesels (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 08:28:02 -0500
Cy, $25000 seems a little high. Modern diesel locomotives carry about 4000 gallons of fuel. That would work out to a price of $6.25/gal. Highway diesel fuel right now in Missouri is about $3.70/gal.
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-08/msg00119.html (12,167 bytes)

119. [CBQ] Re: Diesel Fuel (was Drop Steps On Diesels) (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 08:41:02 -0500
Robert, I spent a lot of time around La Grange during my career and, to a lesser extent, around London. I don't know exactly how much diesel fuel EMD kept on hand, but I would guess around 100,000 ga
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-08/msg00122.html (12,841 bytes)

120. [CBQ] Re:4-8-4's (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:37:53 -0500
Cy, That is basically correct. Of course, two of the O-5s converted to oil were from the second group and were also classed as O-5B. These were 5614 and 5620. Of the oil burners (all six converted in
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-08/msg00209.html (12,617 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu