Return-Path: Delivered-To: unknown Received: from mailhost.usrp-ltd.com (10.45.0.93:110) by pegasus.nauer.org with POP3; 01 Nov 2021 21:55:01 -0000 Delivered-To: archives@nauer.org Received: (qmail 11098 invoked by uid 168); 1 Nov 2021 16:39:39 -0500 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from web01.groups.io by mailhost (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-2.10st (clamdscan: 0.99.2/26096. mhr: 1.0. spamassassin: 3.3.2. perlscan: 2.10st. Clear:RC:0(66.175.222.12):SA:0(-5.6/5.0):. Processed in 1.207645 secs); 01 Nov 2021 21:39:39 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: bounce+11863+62683+703214+1544929@groups.io via mailhost X-Qmail-Scanner: 2.10st (Clear:RC:0(66.175.222.12):SA:0(-5.6/5.0):. Processed in 1.207645 secs Process 11075) Received: from web01.groups.io (66.175.222.12) by mailhost.usrp-ltd.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 1 Nov 2021 16:39:38 -0500 Received-SPF: pass (mailhost.usrp-ltd.com: SPF record at groups.io designates 66.175.222.12 as permitted sender) X-Received: by 127.0.0.2 with SMTP id F09oYY704549xwgdo6djTcw; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 14:35:54 -0700 X-Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.864.1635802552566310862 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 14:35:53 -0700 X-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD033201E17 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 17:35:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 01 Nov 2021 17:35:52 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvdehfedgtdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpegtkfffgggfuffvfhfhjgesrgdtre ertdefjeenucfhrhhomhepuehilhhlucfjihhrthcuoeifhhhirhhtsehfrghsthhmrghi lhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdevudeikeethefgvdejuddvleejvdfgle eitddvhfffhedvtedvleegffdvtdeunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepfihhihhrthesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: X-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 17:35:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <21c355fe-1eed-5d2d-6640-cfe9acaa59c4@fastmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 16:35:51 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.1 Subject: Re: [CBQ] Athearn Product Suggestions To: CBQ@groups.io References: From: "William Hirt" In-Reply-To: Precedence: Bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: Sender: CBQ@groups.io List-Id: Mailing-List: list CBQ@groups.io; contact CBQ+owner@groups.io Delivered-To: mailing list CBQ@groups.io Reply-To: CBQ@groups.io X-Gm-Message-State: wwZ9qcJNxR6DOarZKWCUjeQLx703214AA= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------BBZ6dpGugOwZZZ5Yi9jc9ubS" Content-Language: en-US DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io; q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1635802554; bh=pWc3GDZv/AzeLDO1H6MboUIDBYeg9t8eyZV6jne2fso=; h=Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To; b=VqOlswkw3zazI7H6uOsb2WVj8/bq+WiSvtg2ZyulWJAv6SSfSh/YNilMD8twGHBvpqT 4gm37ZKhqFYFhvX9rHlDRpSWrreVOhgQkLxYj8p3yd98pszzC1pBWP1ZR1tyrSLz24cI4 KSASK+DLSthjRf5gDbzZh1A64WdFTLfIBjI= --------------BBZ6dpGugOwZZZ5Yi9jc9ubS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit There is problem why they may not do (or have not done) the mineral red cars. The Q cars had a unique roof hatch spacing that differed from the common P-S covered hopper arrangement. The CB&Q cars were among the first built by P-S. You would probably have more success trying to get Walthers to do them with their version as they are not as picky. Take a look at an article by Ed Hawkins in Rail Model Journal in September 2005. These back issues are available for viewing on the TrainLife site. Bill Hirt On 11/1/2021 4:01 PM, Rick Keil wrote: > All, > > Since Dave mentioned the list was quiet and I responded to Dennis > Poppish with part of this, I thought I would throw this out to the group. > > Athearn has a product suggestion email, > athearn-productsuggestions@athearn.com and it appears they are > listening as they mention during the Facebook Train Tuesday broadcast > that many of the items they are releasing are a result of > suggestions.  They will not respond but it only cost a few minutes of > time to send them something. > > I sent suggestions on releasing the early airslides in the as > delivered scheme and the PS 2893 in the mineral red.  The more they > hear from us, the better chance we have of getting something > produced.  Specific information helps too. > > There you go Dave, trying to make it not so quiet! > > Ricky Keil > St Louis, MO > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#62683): https://groups.io/g/CBQ/message/62683 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/86752176/703214 Group Owner: CBQ+owner@groups.io Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/CBQ/leave/1544929/703214/691670059/xyzzy [archives@nauer.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- --------------BBZ6dpGugOwZZZ5Yi9jc9ubS Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

There is problem why they may not do (or have not done) the mineral red cars. The Q cars had a unique roof hatch spacing that differed from the common P-S covered hopper arrangement. The CB&Q cars were among the first built by P-S. You would probably have more success trying to get Walthers to do them with their version as they are not as picky. Take a look at an article by Ed Hawkins in Rail Model Journal in September 2005. These back issues are available for viewing on the TrainLife site.


Bill Hirt


On 11/1/2021 4:01 PM, Rick Keil wrote:
All,

Since Dave mentioned the list was quiet and I responded to Dennis Poppish with part of this, I thought I would throw this out to the group.

Athearn has a product suggestion email, athearn-productsuggestions@athearn.com and it appears they are listening as they mention during the Facebook Train Tuesday broadcast that many of the items they are releasing are a result of suggestions.  They will not respond but it only cost a few minutes of time to send them something.

I sent suggestions on releasing the early airslides in the as delivered scheme and the PS 2893 in the mineral red.  The more they hear from us, the better chance we have of getting something produced.  Specific information helps too.

There you go Dave, trying to make it not so quiet!

Ricky Keil
St Louis, MO

_._,_._,_

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#62683) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nauer.org]

_._,_._,_
--------------BBZ6dpGugOwZZZ5Yi9jc9ubS--