Return-Path: <bounce+11863+62279+703214+1544929@groups.io>
Delivered-To: unknown
Received: from mailhost.usrp-ltd.com (10.45.0.93:110) by pegasus.nauer.org
  with POP3; 10 Jul 2021 17:55:01 -0000
Delivered-To: archives@nauer.org
Received: (qmail 2043 invoked by uid 168); 10 Jul 2021 12:34:02 -0500
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from web01.groups.io by mailhost (envelope-from <bounce+11863+62279+703214+1544929@groups.io>, uid 89) with qmail-scanner-2.10st 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/26096. mhr: 1.0. spamassassin: 3.3.2. perlscan: 2.10st.  
 Clear:RC:0(66.175.222.12):SA:0(-5.6/5.0):. 
 Processed in 1.22973 secs); 10 Jul 2021 17:34:02 -0000
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: bounce+11863+62279+703214+1544929@groups.io via mailhost
X-Qmail-Scanner: 2.10st (Clear:RC:0(66.175.222.12):SA:0(-5.6/5.0):. Processed in 1.22973 secs Process 2021)
Received: from web01.groups.io (66.175.222.12)
  by mailhost.usrp-ltd.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 10 Jul 2021 12:34:01 -0500
Received-SPF: pass (mailhost.usrp-ltd.com: SPF record at groups.io designates 66.175.222.12 as permitted sender)
X-Received: by 127.0.0.2 with SMTP id JvzVYY704549x2IbSQ1t5uC; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 10:33:45 -0700
X-Received: from mail-ua1-f49.google.com (mail-ua1-f49.google.com [209.85.222.49])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.26635.1625938423468779135
 for <cbq@groups.io>;
 Sat, 10 Jul 2021 10:33:43 -0700
X-Received: by mail-ua1-f49.google.com with SMTP id c20so5037222uar.12
        for <cbq@groups.io>; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 10:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: 5sHvP28cyfc14hYzGKsonHdfx703214AA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzOka+2pqSuLqx0EHXASlR3if33MD13vW0iKYZhKovlruv30a1KOZ4JcL+vkRVoxg0rT5VryVMh/ZEd+L68OYg=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6805:: with SMTP id z5mr31266944uar.87.1625938422504;
 Sat, 10 Jul 2021 10:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "scott myers" <myers.scottv@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 12:33:17 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+=NcE3vcCnaFDhmAWgfk+7PoBa3jU7O42DroQua2NutTmwV2g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [CBQ] E Unit Diaphragms
To: cbq@groups.io
Precedence: Bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ+unsubscribe@groups.io>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:CBQ+subscribe@groups.io>
List-Help: <mailto:CBQ+help@groups.io>
Sender: CBQ@groups.io
List-Id: <CBQ.groups.io>
Mailing-List: list CBQ@groups.io; contact CBQ+owner@groups.io
Delivered-To: mailing list CBQ@groups.io
Reply-To: CBQ@groups.io
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000019a12d05c6c84afd"
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io;
 q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1625938425;
 bh=btdCXU0tz3RLam+9qS0z+qyQd/cO7Gi0V+EvC4qk4ac=;
 h=Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To;
 b=Q+SFv3w4ELtxc7C7KlEa3PYbQyZiL5ZEVLwiG6K+BkdsVR4r+BHGjybG54fwVqs2JtM
 nPj8GTRSbMqwo2EQeqoHzR7eyZJBN4G4MV8fdt97/TbR4EFwzAWNxmvvgRxDpbQpbXimR
 sNiX/4V1vDfccVPCGfcA+w3/Jf83YULXE/k=

--00000000000019a12d05c6c84afd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I am in the process of adding diaphragms to some of my passenger cars and
wanting to do the same for my E units.  Looking in Zephyr #57, E5A and B
units originally had full width diaphragms.  However, later photos of the
E5s, such as in Zephyr #10, show these replaced with the narrower
diaphragms.  When did this modification occur?

Also, per Zephyr #13, the shovelnose EAs and EBs 9906 and 9907 came with
full width diaphragms.  Were these ever replaced with the standard width
diaphragms, particularly since the EB units were sometimes used as boosters
with E5As in later years?

Scott Myers


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#62279): https://groups.io/g/CBQ/message/62279
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/84116538/703214
Group Owner: CBQ+owner@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/CBQ/leave/1544929/703214/691670059/xyzzy [archives@nauer.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



--00000000000019a12d05c6c84afd
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-size:small">I a=
m in the process of adding diaphragms to some of my passenger cars and want=
ing to do the same for my E units.=C2=A0 Looking in Zephyr #57, E5A and B u=
nits originally had full width diaphragms.=C2=A0 However, later photos of t=
he E5s, such as in Zephyr #10, show these replaced with the narrower diaphr=
agms.=C2=A0 When did this modification occur?=C2=A0 <br></div><div class=3D=
"gmail_default" style=3D"font-size:small"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_def=
ault" style=3D"font-size:small">Also, per Zephyr #13, the shovelnose EAs an=
d EBs 9906 and 9907 came with full width diaphragms.=C2=A0 Were these ever =
replaced with the standard width diaphragms, particularly since the EB unit=
s were sometimes used as boosters with E5As in later years?</div><div class=
=
=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-size:small"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail=
_default" style=3D"font-size:small">Scott Myers<br></div></div>


 <div width=3D"1" style=3D"color:white;clear:both">_._,_._,_</div> <hr>   =
Groups.io Links:<p>   You receive all messages sent to this group.    <p> <=
a target=3D"_blank" href=3D"https://groups.io/g/CBQ/message/62279">View/Rep=
ly Online (#62279)</a> |  <a target=3D"_blank" href=3D"mailto:CBQ@groups.io=
?subject=3DRe:%20%5BCBQ%5D%20E%20Unit%20Diaphragms">Reply To Group</a>  | <=
a target=3D"_blank" href=3D"mailto:myers.scottv@gmail.com?subject=3DPrivate=
:%20Re:%20%5BCBQ%5D%20E%20Unit%20Diaphragms">Reply To Sender</a>   |  <a ta=
rget=3D"_blank" href=3D"https://groups.io/mt/84116538/703214">Mute This Top=
ic</a>  | <a href=3D"https://groups.io/g/CBQ/post">New Topic</a><br>    <a =
href=3D"https://groups.io/g/CBQ/editsub/703214">Your Subscription</a> | <a =
href=3D"mailto:CBQ+owner@groups.io">Contact Group Owner</a> |  <a href=3D"h=
ttps://groups.io/g/CBQ/leave/1544929/703214/691670059/xyzzy">Unsubscribe</a=
>  [archives@nauer.org]<br> <div width=3D"1" style=3D"color:white;clear:bot=
h">_._,_._,_</div>=20


--00000000000019a12d05c6c84afd--