Return-Path: Delivered-To: unknown Received: from mailhost.usrp-ltd.com (10.45.0.93:110) by pegasus.nauer.org with POP3; 10 Jul 2021 22:55:01 -0000 Delivered-To: archives@nauer.org Received: (qmail 23673 invoked by uid 168); 10 Jul 2021 17:00:51 -0500 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from web01.groups.io by mailhost (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-2.10st (clamdscan: 0.99.2/26096. mhr: 1.0. spamassassin: 3.3.2. perlscan: 2.10st. Clear:RC:0(66.175.222.12):SA:0(-5.6/5.0):. Processed in 2.808019 secs); 10 Jul 2021 22:00:51 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: bounce+11863+62281+703214+1544929@groups.io via mailhost X-Qmail-Scanner: 2.10st (Clear:RC:0(66.175.222.12):SA:0(-5.6/5.0):. Processed in 2.808019 secs Process 23641) Received: from web01.groups.io (66.175.222.12) by mailhost.usrp-ltd.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 10 Jul 2021 17:00:48 -0500 Received-SPF: pass (mailhost.usrp-ltd.com: SPF record at groups.io designates 66.175.222.12 as permitted sender) X-Received: by 127.0.0.2 with SMTP id o3ZrYY704549xVhsiE2EUl2; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 15:00:32 -0700 X-Received: from mail-vs1-f54.google.com (mail-vs1-f54.google.com [209.85.217.54]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.983.1625954430770273914 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 15:00:31 -0700 X-Received: by mail-vs1-f54.google.com with SMTP id h5so7745796vsg.12 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 15:00:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: 8xQ4RYKaUhiekEg4WmbnhgWHx703214AA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwCkyExYfvYhZTaUePG0JxyLl1U6gidV9Io48MsahHpj3sZpQ7N32Xy3BkQohkBjIIb+oTGK6iFcOh+eP5umtU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:675:: with SMTP id z21mr1656060vsf.48.1625954429828; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 15:00:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <16907E61C00D6BD3.24921@groups.io> In-Reply-To: <16907E61C00D6BD3.24921@groups.io> From: "scott myers" Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 17:00:04 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [CBQ] E Unit Diaphragms To: CBQ@groups.io Precedence: Bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: Sender: CBQ@groups.io List-Id: Mailing-List: list CBQ@groups.io; contact CBQ+owner@groups.io Delivered-To: mailing list CBQ@groups.io Reply-To: CBQ@groups.io Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000036030905c6cc041a" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io; q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1625954432; bh=iIaAtQW9wVCcyNBAWqJvMEQbLaAKuGzvsI4CE+Kr9WA=; h=Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To; b=Cu4y255pJvmvR9sOLjg7KqfPOzgtAOJfYSo9SBPjFjIYaxw1dK/FDxYIYVcfkJuAly0 8pshA3iHCyKPLFBlaOUUE6fJJYplADKMn3KZ8Ha2kzZ80XsbCEwalVaZGRmQG89cJA7vf aNXrLdmFTC6HGdV8CC+WTTmzp0L6qo74YPE= --00000000000036030905c6cc041a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Oops - I meant Burlington Bulletin, not Zephyr, in my references. Scott Myers On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 12:33 PM scott myers via groups.io wrote: > I am in the process of adding diaphragms to some of my passenger cars and > wanting to do the same for my E units. Looking in Zephyr #57, E5A and B > units originally had full width diaphragms. However, later photos of the > E5s, such as in Zephyr #10, show these replaced with the narrower > diaphragms. When did this modification occur? > > Also, per Zephyr #13, the shovelnose EAs and EBs 9906 and 9907 came with > full width diaphragms. Were these ever replaced with the standard width > diaphragms, particularly since the EB units were sometimes used as boosters > with E5As in later years? > > Scott Myers > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#62281): https://groups.io/g/CBQ/message/62281 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/84116538/703214 Group Owner: CBQ+owner@groups.io Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/CBQ/leave/1544929/703214/691670059/xyzzy [archives@nauer.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- --00000000000036030905c6cc041a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Oop= s - I meant Burlington Bulletin, not Zephyr, in my references.

Scott Myers

On Sat, Jul 10, = 2021 at 12:33 PM scott myers via groups.io= <myers.scottv=3Dgmail.com@groups= .io> wrote:
= I am in the process of adding diaphragms to some of my passenger cars and w= anting to do the same for my E units.=C2=A0 Looking in Zephyr #57, E5A and = B units originally had full width diaphragms.=C2=A0 However, later photos o= f the E5s, such as in Zephyr #10, show these replaced with the narrower dia= phragms.=C2=A0 When did this modification occur?=C2=A0

Also, per Zephyr #13, the shovelnose EA= s and EBs 9906 and 9907 came with full width diaphragms.=C2=A0 Were these e= ver replaced with the standard width diaphragms, particularly since the EB = units were sometimes used as boosters with E5As in later years?

Scott Myers

_._,_._,_
= Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

<= a target=3D"_blank" href=3D"https://groups.io/g/CBQ/message/62281">View/Rep= ly Online (#62281) | Reply To Group<= /a> | Reply To Se= nder | Mute This Topic | New T= opic
Your Sub= scription | Contact Group Owner<= /a> | Unsubscribe [archives@nauer.org]

_._,_._,_
=20 --00000000000036030905c6cc041a--