Return-Path: Delivered-To: unknown Received: from mailhost.usrp-ltd.com (10.45.0.93:110) by pegasus.nauer.org with POP3; 12 Jul 2021 16:55:01 -0000 Delivered-To: archives@nauer.org Received: (qmail 3281 invoked by uid 168); 12 Jul 2021 11:30:58 -0500 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from web01.groups.io by mailhost (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-2.10st (clamdscan: 0.99.2/26096. mhr: 1.0. spamassassin: 3.3.2. perlscan: 2.10st. Clear:RC:0(66.175.222.12):SA:0(-5.6/5.0):. Processed in 1.080522 secs); 12 Jul 2021 16:30:58 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: bounce+11863+62284+703214+1544929@groups.io via mailhost X-Qmail-Scanner: 2.10st (Clear:RC:0(66.175.222.12):SA:0(-5.6/5.0):. Processed in 1.080522 secs Process 3269) Received: from web01.groups.io (66.175.222.12) by mailhost.usrp-ltd.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 12 Jul 2021 11:30:56 -0500 Received-SPF: pass (mailhost.usrp-ltd.com: SPF record at groups.io designates 66.175.222.12 as permitted sender) X-Received: by 127.0.0.2 with SMTP id P5qIYY704549xsSzhWxND2Q; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 09:30:37 -0700 X-Received: from resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net [69.252.207.39]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web08.13591.1626107428744317226 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 09:30:28 -0700 X-Received: from resomta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.103]) by resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id 2tycmFlc0IdOQ2ypAmR6dC; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:30:28 +0000 X-Received: from oxapp-ch2f-70o.email.comcast.net ([96.117.82.150]) by resomta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPS id 2yozmPP2lbzhE2yp9mOH87; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:30:27 +0000 X-Xfinity-VAAS: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddruddvgdellecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucevohhmtggrshhtqdftvghsihdpqfgfvfdppffquffrtefokffrnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddunecunecujfgurhepfffhvffkjghfufggtgfrkgfoihesrgdtsggsredtjeenucfhrhhomhepiffgqfftiffgucevtfethgfhqfftffcuoehgvghorhhgvggtrhgrfihfohhrughsrhestghomhgtrghsthdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfdtuddvvedtffektdeitdekgfevfeeugfefhfekkeegffefvefhjeevfefffefgnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgrhhouhhpshdrihhonecukfhppeeliedruddujedrkedvrdduhedtpddviedtudemudegheemtgdvtddumeekfedvtdemfhgtfhegmedvjeekvdemvdguieefmeejiegrfeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopehogigrphhpqdgthhdvfhdqjedtohdrvghmrghilhdrtghomhgtrghsthdrnhgvthdpihhnvghtpeeliedruddujedrkedvrdduhedtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepghgvohhrghgvtghrrgiffhhorhgushhrsegtohhmtggrshhtrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtoheptggsqhesghhrohhuphhsrdhioh X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=0.00;st=legit Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 12:30:17 -0400 (EDT) From: "George N." To: CBQ@groups.io Message-ID: <1834385955.522630.1626107417667@connect.xfinity.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [CBQ] Tall Globe Lantern needs cleaning MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Originating-IP: 2601:145:c201:8320:fcf4:2782:2d63:76a3 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite Precedence: Bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: Sender: CBQ@groups.io List-Id: Mailing-List: list CBQ@groups.io; contact CBQ+owner@groups.io Delivered-To: mailing list CBQ@groups.io Reply-To: CBQ@groups.io X-Gm-Message-State: PJpkLn9O7t3wbHOZzp1B9I4Vx703214AA= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_522629_1490883911.1626107417651" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io; q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1626107437; bh=XpwYPR7bXoWZUnVA1lH7g/YMTd2c7Gatf2f1qz4M4Xs=; h=Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To; b=NIYjFg2FgZ/mysEFblirWY4MZu5SYfiAS0zJ8Y+jTRYk0Jnv1hR7tltBGg3uegHtGuf suR8nhMIUcXfwLq0lK7xGl4RyyWsH+n8g9oM18nrhb5murFXU7FWiYj98UInz1Lx2C8w+ FswN1nYDq53jMpPNksv0UC+9qVa3ain8t70= ------=_Part_522629_1490883911.1626107417651 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ray, I have two of the same lantern. Had to get a reproduction globe. You may try a rag dampened with Laquer THINER not mineral spirits then use windex with vinigar. Also talk to Kirk Lanterns. Noel > On 07/12/2021 12:20 PM Ray Bedard wrote: > > > I have a Burlington tall globe lantern with the square logo embossed on the globe. It is in great shape, except for the globe. It has a "milky" film on the globe that I would like to remove. Other than Windex, I have yet to try anything else. I have read that water and vinegar can clear cloudy glasses, but not certain how that would work on the globe. I know that vinegar can etch glass, so I am hesitant in trying this method. > > Anyone have any suggestions? > > Thank > Ray Bedard > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#62284): https://groups.io/g/CBQ/message/62284 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/84157410/703214 Group Owner: CBQ+owner@groups.io Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/CBQ/leave/1544929/703214/691670059/xyzzy [archives@nauer.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ------=_Part_522629_1490883911.1626107417651 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Ray,
  I have two of the same lantern. Had to get a reproduction globe.  You may try a rag dampened with
Laquer THINER not mineral spirits then use windex with vinigar. Also talk to Kirk Lanterns.
Noel
On 07/12/2021 12:20 PM Ray Bedard <tczephyr@hotmail.com> wrote:
 
 
I have a Burlington tall globe lantern with the square logo embossed on the globe. It is in great shape, except for the globe. It has a "milky" film on the globe that I would like to remove. Other than Windex, I have yet to try anything else. I have read that water and vinegar can clear cloudy glasses, but not certain how that would work on the globe. I know that vinegar can etch glass, so I am hesitant in trying this method.

Anyone have any suggestions?

Thank
Ray Bedard
_._,_._,_
Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#62284) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nauer.org]

_._,_._,_
------=_Part_522629_1490883911.1626107417651--