Return-Path: Delivered-To: unknown Received: from mailhost.usrp-ltd.com (10.45.0.93:110) by pegasus.nauer.org with POP3; 02 Nov 2020 02:55:01 -0000 Delivered-To: archives@nauer.org Received: (qmail 22910 invoked by uid 168); 1 Nov 2020 20:31:46 -0600 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from web01.groups.io by mailhost (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-2.10st (clamdscan: 0.99.2/25974. mhr: 1.0. spamassassin: 3.3.2. perlscan: 2.10st. Clear:RC:0(66.175.222.12):SA:0(-5.7/5.0):. Processed in 1.946614 secs); 02 Nov 2020 02:31:46 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=5.0 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: bounce+11863+60730+703214+1544929@groups.io via mailhost X-Qmail-Scanner: 2.10st (Clear:RC:0(66.175.222.12):SA:0(-5.7/5.0):. Processed in 1.946614 secs Process 22896) Received: from web01.groups.io (66.175.222.12) by mailhost.usrp-ltd.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 1 Nov 2020 20:31:44 -0600 Received-SPF: pass (mailhost.usrp-ltd.com: SPF record at groups.io designates 66.175.222.12 as permitted sender) X-Received: by 127.0.0.2 with SMTP id 2UeFYY704549x5fVP16ixsf; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 18:26:37 -0800 Subject: Re: [CBQ] Eastbound Coal Trains Through Savanna To: CBQ@groups.io From: "Tom Mack via groups.io" X-Originating-Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, US (162.154.240.83) X-Originating-Platform: Windows Chrome 86 User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 18:26:35 -0800 References: <740133703.765556.1604282401915@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <740133703.765556.1604282401915@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <470.1604283995706950602@groups.io> Precedence: Bulk List-Unsubscribe: Sender: CBQ@groups.io List-Id: Mailing-List: list CBQ@groups.io; contact CBQ+owner@groups.io Delivered-To: mailing list CBQ@groups.io Reply-To: CBQ@groups.io X-Gm-Message-State: mI9G6gQkdaQd2z0GUk9bClrvx703214AA= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="IjUNTfwZOTO1DJ8Uz9ju" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io; q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1604283997; bh=Cb2Dg1nJ1SMP0bela8WELkRgOFX12iEwvTpDfb4aRnQ=; h=Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To; b=uXsz7a+d+6HMMzWW/FcDIKMrU4yxBqILK27VbV30MO65ijqWE6qGGInOI1RI6PtXELA 48UaMJO7zuoFLyOi3+AQ3gcREVrUltcww9n2zw4MIfPtWaTlTtllglQg7Xv9VVZj9g8ds EAtM1Rrs0DaXnDZgEMXN/jx+ZyCsvmC1LLc= --IjUNTfwZOTO1DJ8Uz9ju Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 09:00 PM, Ted Schnepf wrote: >=20 > It might be a cut of loaded hoppers at the front of a regular mixed > freight train. Hi Ted, Yes, valid point. It just seemed odd since I can't recall ever seeing that= many loaded coal cars together in a picture of an eastbound freight throug= h or on either side of Savanna. And while I guess a mine could ship out a l= onger cut of cars vs. a whole train, wheel reports I have seen on the NP an= d GN mixed freights never showed a large number of loaded coal hoppers head= ed east. So my mind just jumped to the possibility of this being a pure coa= l train vs. a mixed freight, which could make sense if Powder River coal wa= s starting to flow from the mines to powerplants around this time. I guess = the triple set of heavy GE's (U30C-U28B-U30C) also reminds me of power on a= unit coal train. Finally, I was also hoping that there might be an explanation that could j= ustify my running a unit coal train eastbound on my layout just before the = BN merger! :-) -- Tom Mack Cincinnati, OH -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#60730): https://groups.io/g/CBQ/message/60730 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/77957264/703214 Group Owner: CBQ+owner@groups.io Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/CBQ/leave/1544929/691670059/xyzzy [archiv= es@nauer.org] -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D- --IjUNTfwZOTO1DJ8Uz9ju Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 09:00 PM, Ted Schnepf wrote:
It might be a cut of loaded hoppers at the front of a regular = mixed freight train.
Hi Ted,

Yes, valid point. It just seemed odd since I can't reca= ll ever seeing that many loaded coal cars together in a picture of an eastb= ound freight through or on either side of Savanna. And while I guess a mine= could ship out a longer cut of cars vs. a whole train, wheel reports I hav= e seen on the NP and GN mixed freights never showed a large number of loade= d coal hoppers headed east. So my mind just jumped to the possibility of th= is being a pure coal train vs. a mixed freight, which could make sense if P= owder River coal was starting to flow from the mines to powerplants around = this time. I guess the triple set of heavy GE's (U30C-U28B-U30C) also remin= ds me of power on a unit coal train.

Finally, I was also hoping = that there might be an explanation that could justify my running a unit coa= l train eastbound on my layout just before the BN merger! :-)
 --
Tom Mack
Cincinnati, OH
_._,_._,_

Gr= oups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply= Online (#60730) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nauer.org]=

_._,_._,_
=20 --IjUNTfwZOTO1DJ8Uz9ju--