Return-Path: Delivered-To: unknown Received: from mailhost.usrp-ltd.com (10.45.0.93:110) by pegasus.nauer.org with POP3; 19 Nov 2020 18:55:02 -0000 Delivered-To: archives@nauer.org Received: (qmail 22831 invoked by uid 168); 19 Nov 2020 12:59:09 -0600 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from web01.groups.io by mailhost (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-2.10st (clamdscan: 0.99.2/25992. mhr: 1.0. spamassassin: 3.3.2. perlscan: 2.10st. Clear:RC:0(66.175.222.12):SA:0(-5.6/5.0):. Processed in 1.215595 secs); 19 Nov 2020 18:59:09 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: bounce+11863+60814+703214+1544929@groups.io via mailhost X-Qmail-Scanner: 2.10st (Clear:RC:0(66.175.222.12):SA:0(-5.6/5.0):. Processed in 1.215595 secs Process 22819) Received: from web01.groups.io (66.175.222.12) by mailhost.usrp-ltd.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Nov 2020 12:59:07 -0600 Received-SPF: pass (mailhost.usrp-ltd.com: SPF record at groups.io designates 66.175.222.12 as permitted sender) X-Received: by 127.0.0.2 with SMTP id AKSpYY704549xqP8UxX8rFI; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:53:29 -0800 X-Received: from resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net [69.252.207.38]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.13848.1605812007440591819 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:53:27 -0800 X-Received: from resomta-ch2-20v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.116]) by resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id fm1ZkZKhOpzNLfp3ekofbV; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:53:26 +0000 X-Received: from CVPC ([IPv6:2601:484:8000:3760:4d14:31fd:2867:8f1b]) by resomta-ch2-20v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id fp3dkTaAWw0lofp3ekGuhT; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:53:26 +0000 X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=0.00;st=legit From: "Charlie Vlk" To: , , , Subject: [CBQ] Slide and Negative Scanners Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:53:25 -0600 Message-ID: <011001d6bea5$4360b1a0$ca2214e0$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Thread-Index: Ada+o2G62gbXTfaqSom4wRb7/FlvPg== Precedence: Bulk List-Unsubscribe: Sender: CBQ@groups.io List-Id: Mailing-List: list CBQ@groups.io; contact CBQ+owner@groups.io Delivered-To: mailing list CBQ@groups.io Reply-To: CBQ@groups.io X-Gm-Message-State: nRij9uHPprsTu0v1EF81J7oTx703214AA= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0111_01D6BE72.F8C641A0" Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io; q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1605812009; bh=JoToBTn37+pbh8AVmCCvknvs4ikCRu7xKjqukO0Noxg=; h=Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To; b=tpjzEeB8w7t3oBDIdmDkIgl40I9YIsG1gH5rj/BVNrZ1hSQGtxPdJ5hlouaPuCbzUEq tU5BoPvYZT4AtiJl+2Mb7ZPWWX3n3Yib8D5JyKH+4JcdBAPVvEaQZ2IzYINQCdqMeis16 pQjmb5oC6HLdkmESz/Qo/mEfahxuhfKplH8= ------=_NextPart_000_0111_01D6BE72.F8C641A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All- =20 Does anyone have any experience with slide and negative scanners? My all= -in-one copiers can do a decent job of digitizing photo prints but, even th= ough a couple of them have slide processing capability they are somewhat cl= unky to use and I have many hundreds of slides and negatives to scan. =20 An additional wrinkle is that I have about 1000 microfilm aperture cards w= ith CB&Q locomotive, freight and passenger car drawings on them which I wou= ld also like to scan. They are on computer keypunch-size cards 3 =C2=BC wi= de x 7 =C2=BE so I am hoping on getting something that can accommodate that= width card or be modified to do so. Some of the scanners look like they h= ave carriers that be duplicated in sheet plastic to make a custom holder=E2= = =80=A6if the slot is 3 =C2=BC wide or more. As a last resort I could trim= the width of the cards down to fit but I=E2=80=99d rather not. =20 I don=E2=80=99t want to go crazy with speed or quality and get a $5000 pro= fessional unit but I don=E2=80=99t want to go cheap and get the Kodak foldi= ng box gizmo or the low-end stuff that has no resolution. I=E2=80=99d rat= her get one that can connect to my computer for post processing rather than= loading to a memory card. I already have VuScanX64 software which I have= used to scan using my all-in-one. =20 If any of you have experience with scanners and can share thoughts or reco= mmendations on brands or models to consider it would be much appreciated. =20 While the subject is technically off-topic it may be of interest to many i= n each group, please respond off-list unless moderators allow it to run as = supporting the interests of the group. =20 Charlie Vlk Mt. Juliet, TN -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#60814): https://groups.io/g/CBQ/message/60814 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/78372216/703214 Group Owner: CBQ+owner@groups.io Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/CBQ/leave/1544929/691670059/xyzzy [archiv= es@nauer.org] -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D- ------=_NextPart_000_0111_01D6BE72.F8C641A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

All-

 =

Does anyone have any experience with slide a= nd negative scanners?   My all-in-one copiers can do a decent job= of digitizing photo prints but, even though a couple of them have slide pr= ocessing capability they are somewhat clunky to use and I have many hundred= s of slides and negatives to scan.

=  

An additional wrinkle is that I have a= bout 1000 microfilm aperture cards with CB&Q locomotive, freight and pa= ssenger car drawings on them which I would also like to scan.  They ar= e on computer keypunch-size cards 3 =C2=BC wide x 7 =C2=BE so I am hoping o= n getting something that can accommodate that width card or be modified to = do so.  Some of the scanners look like they have carriers that be dupl= icated in sheet plastic to make a custom holder=E2=80=A6if the slot is 3 = =C2=BC wide or more.  As a last resort I could trim the width of the = cards down to fit but I=E2=80=99d rather not.

 

I don=E2=80=99t want to go = crazy with speed or quality and get a $5000 professional unit but I don=E2= =80=99t want to go cheap and get the Kodak folding box gizmo or the low-en= d stuff that has no resolution.   I=E2=80=99d rather get one that= can connect to my computer for post processing rather than loading to a me= mory card.=C2=A0=C2=A0 I already have VuScanX64 software which I have used = to scan using my all-in-one.

 =

If any of you have experience with scanners = and can share thoughts or recommendations on brands or models to consider i= t would be much appreciated.

 =

While the subject is technically off-topic i= t may be of interest to many in each group, please respond off-list unless = moderators allow it to run as supporting the interests of the group.

 

Char= lie Vlk

Mt. Juliet, TN

_._,_._,_
Gr= oups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply= Online (#60814) | Reply To Grou= p | Reply To Sende= r | Mute This Topic | New Topi= c
Your Subscr= iption | Contact Group Owner= | Unsub= scribe [archives@nauer.org]

_._,_._,_
=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0111_01D6BE72.F8C641A0--