Re: [CBQ] Bad copy

["Douglas Hosler" <dehosler40@gmail.com>]

Thank you Rupert!  

It crossed my mind that since I never have counted all the pages in any journal, what I found in BB #67 could be a common practice that I had never have noticed before.  

I do like the practice because certainly in publications like the Bulletin there is a lot of information on the covers (outside and inside) that one might want to refer to quickly and easily and not have to use lengthy ways of making reference.  There may be other advantages as well.        

Doug

On Jul 29, 2016, at 2:55 PM, Rupert Gamlen <gamlenz@hotmail.com> wrote:

Doug

I think that the covers have always been part of the page count. Certainly the Publications Index is based on that premise.

Rupert Gamlen
Auckland NZ

-----Original Message-----
From: CBQ@groups.io <CBQ@groups.io> On Behalf Of Douglas Hosler
Sent: Saturday, 30 July 2022 6:13 am
To: CBQ@groups.io
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Bad copy

I got my copy of BB #67 last week (in Central Wisconsin), so in a timely fashion.   

Those who have reported missing or extra pages made me worried, so I checked: all of the pages in the copy I received are in order; there are no extra pages.  

One thing unusual for me is that the cover (front and back) is counted as part of the pages.  That practice could simplify making references to places in the Bulletin.

Doug Hosler

_._,_._,_

---

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#64051) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nauer.org]

_._,_._,_