To: | CBQ@groups.io |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] 44 ton switcher |
From: | "Nolen Null via Groups.Io" <NNull=aol.com@groups.io> |
Date: | Tue, 16 Apr 2019 02:16:36 +0000 (UTC) |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@groups.io |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io; q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1555381018; bh=e8XHynRktS+6dyIEPIA9XtI9MA5S1ZGznGibx3qQyaY=; h=Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To; b=uaKoMzkmmbdoff2fWvsPhBKmRvXIx8s6R+0xdF6GRP6vEB9OgELBgUvm9Jr6jnyeQKX npd9AkkmNTkECU/1loQE8mwxudkVyK3CvISl+DTDYqKPh80YUSdKfcps4emie8B7MDmUE reXagsQ0aBR8vT2mq6pXoWNbh0O0YJvPZ8Q= |
List-id: | <CBQ.groups.io> |
List-unsubscribe: | <https://groups.io/g/CBQ/unsub> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@groups.io; contact CBQ+owner@groups.io |
References: | <681567694.1203562.1555380996503.ref@mail.yahoo.com> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@groups.io |
Sender: | CBQ@groups.io |
Yes, W&R did the 44 tonners that are correct for CB&Q. As I recall the difference was in the step/handrail placement. 9103 was the first GE 44 tonner. Am I getting old, or what?
.
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Gortowski via Groups.Io <rgortowski=aol.com@groups.io> To: CBQ <CBQ@groups.io> Sent: Mon, Apr 15, 2019 9:51 pm Subject: Re: [CBQ] 44 ton switcher W&R. A long time ago.
someone did it in brass years and years ago, don't remember who though.
_._,_._,_
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#57092) |
Reply To Group
|
Mute This Topic
| New Topic _._,_._,_
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] 44 ton switcher, Richard Gortowski via Groups.Io |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Grain Elevators, Grain Covered Hoppers, and Traffic, Steven Holding |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] 44 ton switcher, Richard Gortowski via Groups.Io |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] 44 ton switcher, William Hirt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |