BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [CBQ] Re: C&S E5 on Dinky

To: "CBQ@yahoogroups.com" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [CBQ] Re: C&S E5 on Dinky
From: "Rupert Gamlen gamlenz@hotmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 03:56:32 +0000
Accept-language: en-NZ, en-US
Authentication-results: mta1004.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com from=hotmail.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=hotmail.com; dkim=pass (ok)
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1516075006; bh=4OxHZk0RORPBuwH8tPAZKmHHzhJm3KVymzyPaelH7JU=; h=To:References:In-Reply-To:From:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=HfvHA4gLnXt5NK+8XtXfJfTULZIgmVkoYELT8dYoYobERFkgRcmBB2Mls7ygFNUr/ODtbDQs1U6ryEymVofq0A1k0jXiaiWaT74OCbc4j4BKvWuyCIab0hrCXUjqx68sWjNGN+wnqL3nOVJ9e4fCOAfNI3ZgyP+t9TPnQlv8fIQ=
In-reply-to: <97643884-B663-413E-A20C-2D36E0A86A09@yahoo.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <716303450.3540778.1516038256334.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <716303450.3540778.1516038256334@mail.yahoo.com> <3B38B53F-0159-489D-8C16-CC4EA3F383AD@yahoo.com> <CY1PR14MB0748E6C8F2822705E60EEDFFCAEB0@CY1PR14MB0748.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <97643884-B663-413E-A20C-2D36E0A86A09@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
Thread-index: AQHTjjOi0d0lefN5akaQ92ue/AZTQaN1UhiAgAA0rACAAC0WAIAAKWMA
Thread-topic: [CBQ] Re: C&S E5 on Dinky


Were there any modifications, repairs, etc. that couldn’t be carried out in the company shops, requiring an E-5 to visit to EMD?

Rupert Gamlen
Auckland NZ

 

From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CBQ@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 16 January 2018 2:20 p.m.
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: C&S E5 on Dinky

 



I guess another question that comes to mind is why the Q would use 9950A in tests when the first set of E8s, delivered in 1949, were already on the property?

Sent from my iPhone



__._,_.___

Posted by: Rupert Gamlen <gamlenz@hotmail.com>



__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>