BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Barriger Photos, CONSOLIDATED INDEX

To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Barriger Photos, CONSOLIDATED INDEX
From: <runextra@gmail.com>
Date: 18 Feb 2014 09:29:01 -0800
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1392744542; bh=lwutzh5OcauTvNxuMs21aYSwMBcuWfYIt1PPkdIm/eM=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:X-Mailer:References:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=HQAzkxQ1DgwUWOzvZteXaO6CS3ApEZ167iOpvZ6IsOpAZ7gfp0uKuB0lVFHpApYRXp2IqiScRq3Zgta42+qVQTeE+YWEKzlOicIZjIKUB7DvYr3GoYh+w+W1DyO8Yk5jv0N7wT3uQ/i15RSpbHp+eL38PDsoqi78wNOsYejNex0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=pW2AM+bIIlaoarmlfhsTVIv/e/gFTB9Y9PBqif6m/eFOz0/aAk5ofUABz7nR5fE5ZwU0hn54K/nkeNPq0MDwtnhlEN2S4hDeggZBjXqQhDfm2FLpFJut/6oZu8TSnmOjCnBPd+xqbYkG+s6lcso53O0KYPWvm9aKEn0NqxIU1mw=;
In-reply-to: <5302AADA.2030406@gmail.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <197ca.5e937ce2.4033942a@aol.com> <6C582F11-6620-4CDB-8296-C3F0943C23D8@surewest.net> <5302AADA.2030406@gmail.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
>459 Sheridan, MT
>460 Sheridan, MT 
>461 Sheridan, MT
 >462 Sheridan, MT
While there is a Sheridan, MT the CB&Q's Sheridan is in Wyoming as are those 
photos.  I know. I live there. ;-)

>463 Hardin, MT
>465 Hardin, MT
Nope. 463 and 465 are Gillette, WY not Hardin,MT.  Both are looking west. 
Some photos earlier tagged as "reversed" have since been reposted correctly. 
Don't know who is doing that but it is nice of them.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>